Antibiotic activity altered by interaction with nanoplastics, new research shows

By Tarun Sai LomteReviewed by Lily Ramsey, LLMNov 20 2024

Study reveals that nanoplastics can reduce antibiotic effectiveness and promote resistance by forming stable aggregates with drugs.

​​​​​​​Study: The adsorption of drugs on nanoplastics has severe biological impact. Image Credit: AlexandrMusuc/Shutterstock.com

In a recent study published in Scientific Reports, researchers reported that drug adsorption on micro- and nano-plastics (MNPs) has severe consequences.

Introduction

Plastic degradation results in the formation of particles with diverse shapes, sizes, and compositions. Research suggests these micro- and nano-sized fragments, viz., MNPs, are present in the environment and enter the human body, even cells.

MNPs can adsorb different substances and deliver them to living organisms. Endocrine disruptors are among the compounds that enter life forms and trigger toxic effects.

Residual drugs in wastewater could enter the human and animal bodies, causing physiological changes. This is particularly concerning in the case of antimicrobials; bacteria exposed to these compounds may develop resistance.

Further, the abundance of resistance genes has increased due to the continuous anthropogenic use (or misuse) of antimicrobials. Besides, MNPs provide a surface for microbes to colonize, serving as vectors for transmission.

About the study

In the present study, researchers assessed the interactions of tetracycline (TC), a broad-spectrum antibiotic, with nanoplastics and whether its biological activity is altered.

Four types of plastics were selected: polystyrene (PS), polyethylene (PE), nylon 6,6 (N66), and polypropylene (PP); these were henceforth referred to as NPs instead of MNPs because their sizes did not exceed the nanoscale. Two approaches were employed to generate TC-NP complexes through chemical computation.

First, the NP was folded from individual polymer chains in the presence of TC through multiple simulated annealing (SA) setups. In the second approach, the free particle (FP) method, the NP was pre-folded through SA, and TC was placed on its surface in different orientations.

All conformations underwent geometry optimization. Further, semi-empirical quantum chemical calculations were performed, and sorption energies and binding modes were derived from these calculations.

Two molecular dynamics simulations were performed for each NP to analyze the solvation behavior and temperature influence of the TC-NP aggregates.

Finally, the researchers evaluated the effects of plastic particles (PE terephthalate (PET), PS, or PE) on the activity of TC in mouse and human cell lines, in which the expression of a fluorescent reporter protein was regulated by a TC-controlled promoter.

Findings

The FP and SA approaches generated 104 aggregates for each NP. The relative total energies of the structures were variable. FP data scattered less since these conformer aggregates varied exclusively in their surface structure. Scattering was the lowest for PE but the highest for PS and PP.

The refolding of TC-NP complexes in the SA method allowed for adjusting the polymer chains to TC and selecting the best possible conformation to maximize the sum of NP-TC and NP-NP interplay.

The FP method yielded considerably less stable structures compared to the SA approach. Overall, the SA approach performed better than the FP method.

On PE, the less polar side of TC was attached to the NP, and the hydroxyl, amide, and carbonyl groups were pointed toward the aqueous solvent. In contrast, on N66, TC alignment was the opposite, and the polar-polar interactions between TC and N66 were stronger than their solvation.

In the SA method, TC was often inside the NP, buried beneath the polymer chains. Further, molecular dynamics simulations of two TC-NP structures of each plastic in water revealed significant differences in the mobilities of the NP chains.

PS chains were the least mobile, with the largest functional groups attached to their polyolefin backbone that may provide steric hindrance or friction.

Likewise, N66 movement was also hindered due to the strong hydrogen bonds between amide groups. The rearrangement of PP was remarkable, with nearly two times greater deviations than the starting structures, suggesting it could rearrange enough to accommodate TC within.

Further, TC diffused significantly on the top of N66 and PP particles. While TC detached from PS during equilibration, it re-attached over time.

In simulations starting with TC on the surface of NPs, the number of hydrogen bonds was high, with many hydrogen-bond acceptor and donor sites occupied with a water molecule.

In contrast, there were significant differences in simulations that started with TC inside the NPs. PS and N66 retained the drug molecule inside them; as such, the hydrogen bonding sites of TC were inaccessible to water molecules.

Moreover, N66 hydrogen bonding sites can interact with TC; thus, they compete with water for the antibiotic. For PP and PE, the number of hydrogen bonds between TC and water was high, similar to those in simulations with TC on the surface of NPs.

Finally, incubating cells with PS, PE, or PET significantly reduced TC-induced expression of the fluorescent reporter protein in both cell lines.

Conclusions

Taken together, the study investigated the interactions of NPs with TC. Folding the NPs in the presence of TC resulted in high-energy structures, enabling reorientation and adjustment of polymer chains to the drug. The SA method yielded the most stable TC-NP complexes. Moreover, TC was more often situated inside the NPs.

Further, in vitro experiments showed that the effect of TC was significantly reduced in the presence of plastics. Overall, the findings indicate that MNPs pose substantial health risks, as they may alter drug absorption, facilitate drug transport to new locations, and increase local concentrations of the antibiotic, potentially promoting resistance.