Religious doctors do not care more for the poor

A new study by doctors in the U.S. has found that being religious does not enhance the way a doctor cares for poor patients.

The study suggests that even doctors who consider religion to be a major motivating factor in their lives are no more likely to care for poor, underserved patients than those who have no religious affiliation.

The research was prompted by Dr. Farr Curlin, of the University of Chicago, who is himself a religious person.

Dr. Curlin says he undertook the study because many religions include a call to serve the poor and he was curious to see whether doctors with established religious beliefs were more likely to take care of patients who are poor.

Curlin and his colleagues at Yale New Haven Hospital in Connecticut mailed surveys to 1,820 practicing doctors of whom 63 percent responded.

Questions regarding the role of religion as a motive in the doctors lives provided a measure of "intrinsic religiosity" and the doctors also answered questions about how frequently they attended religious services, the extent they considered themselves to be spiritual, and whether they believed the practice of medicine was a calling.

The team found that doctors who were deemed more religious were no more likely to report caring for underserved patient populations such as the poor, uninsured or on Medicaid, the federal program for the poor.

Dr. Curlin says the study showed that religious physicians are not disproportionately caring for the underserved.

The researchers say the doctors who were more likely to report practice among the underserved included those who were highly spiritual, those who strongly agreed their religious beliefs influenced their practice of medicine and those who strongly agreed the family in which they were raised emphasized service to the poor.

Underserved in regard to health services refers to populations which are disadvantaged because of ability to pay, ability to access care, ability to access comprehensive health care.

The study appears in the July-August issue of the journal Annals of Family Medicine.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New long COVID index highlights five symptom subtypes