Concierge medicine for the masses could succeed where insurance-based health care fails

Concierge medicine for the masses -- in which patients pay an annual fee or retainer directly to their physicians -- could succeed where insurance-based health care fails, former "New York Times" business reporter Lawrence Fisher argues in the latest "Milken Institute Review."

"Could there be a low-cost, high-quality fix for much of what ails American health care, one that requires no new legislation and no additional taxes?" Fisher asks. He says "direct primary care" could boost the number of family practitioners and help restore the patient-doctor relationship.

Also in this issue:

-- David Andrews of Scripps College examines the delicate balance of interests behind China's on-again, off-again support for the dollar. -- George Feiger, the CEO of Contango Capital Advisors, makes the argument that in global finance, smaller is better. -- Barry Eichengreen of the University of California at Berkeley offers six radical proposals for redesigning the global economy's financial architecture. -- Economists Roger Sedjo of Resources for the Future and Brent Sohngen of Ohio State University examine the dark side of Washington's initiatives to make ethanol fuel from cellulose. -- Edward Hugh, a Barcelona-based economist, weighs the impact of the global recession on transitioning economies of Eastern Europe. -- Jagadeesh Gokhale and Peter Van Doren, senior fellows at the Cato Institute, warn that financial reform may bring regulation that stifles innovation and doesn't lead to long-term recovery. -- G. Pascal Zachary of the University of California at Berkeley looks at the consequences of the Internet revolution and information overload in a time of financial crisis.

Also included: an excerpt from Justin Fox's latest book, "The Myth of the Rational Market"; an update on translational research from the Milken Institute's FasterCures/The Center for Accelerating Medical Solutions; and a charticle that questions the future of the dollar as a reserve currency.

"The Milken Institute Review" is sent quarterly to leading business and financial executives, senior policymakers and journalists. Its editor is Peter Passell, a former economics columnist for "The New York Times."

SOURCE: Milken Institute

Comments

  1. leslie leslie United States says:

    I would certainly use this service if it existed and it sounds like it would be great for the primary care doctors in that they would not be dealing with insurance. Great idea!

  2. Suzanne Dewey Suzanne Dewey United States says:

    The question boils down to this -- if primary care physicians are happier and feel that they are providing the care they want to provide;  and patients are happier -- believing they are getting good care and not feeling rushed and having greater access, is there something more to be discussed?  Is this a "back to the future" scenario?  Isn't the Marcus Welby model akin to the medical home model?  If we can provide better care, focus on prevention and lower overall costs, then YES, I vote YES!!

  3. Michael Tetrault Michael Tetrault United States says:

    A new online news source, Concierge Medicine Today, is now available for physicians interested in this relatively new practice model.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
AI in medicine: Revolutionary tools, uncertain results