Government not held accountable for keeping nurses safe during SARS, Supreme Court denies appeal

Registered nurses in Ontario are devastated today to learn that the Supreme Court of Canada has denied an appeal of an earlier legal decision regarding responsibility for keeping nurses safe during the SARS outbreak.

The Supreme Court today denied the appeal by the Ontario Nurses' Association (ONA) of an earlier decision to dismiss an action filed on behalf of 53 nurses who contracted SARS while caring for infected patients in 2003. The Ontario Court of Appeal had ruled that the province of Ontario owed no "private law duty of care" to registered nurses during SARS, leaving them without a monetary remedy to hold governments accountable in court.

ONA President Linda Haslam-Stroud, RN, says the loss is another blow to a profession that continues to suffer position cuts, heavier workloads and other challenges while simply trying to provide quality care to their patients.

"The courts have sent the message to front-line registered nurses who were infected with SARS that their health is unimportant - they seem to be considered expendable," says Haslam-Stroud. "The decision means that government - which funds health care - hasn't been held accountable through the courts to ensure that RNs had safe working conditions and safe equipment during SARS. It's mind-boggling."

ONA has worked for years within the existing workplace safety laws to ensure that RNs have safe working conditions and safe equipment, notes Haslam-Stroud. She vows that the union will continue to do so through every avenue available, which it has successfully done during the H1N1 pandemic. But the lack of accountability during SARS has sent a chill through the profession.

"Despite all the lessons that we learned from SARS, front-line nurses still encountered difficulties accessing protective equipment during the H1N1 pandemic," she says. "ONA will have to continue to push for safe conditions for its members. We are on the front lines and we want to provide quality patient care. ONA will have to be ever vigilant in ensuring that our members are properly armed with information and protective equipment in cases where nurses' safety isn't a priority."

Source: ONTARIO NURSES' ASSOCIATION

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Study reveals the impact of malicious bots on public health communication during COVID-19