New tuberculosis vaccine provides better protection

Nele Festjens and Nico Callewaert of VIB and Ghent University have improved the efficacy of the vaccine for tuberculosis. The new vaccine affords - as already proven in mice - better protection against the disease. The development of a new tuberculosis vaccine is a priority in the fight against the disease which claims the lives of 1.7 million people each year. The current vaccine provides only partial protection.

Nico Callewaert: "Our vaccine is more effective because it is more quickly recognized by the immune system of the vaccinated person. We have, as it were, undressed the existing vaccine by removing its protective shield."

Tuberculosis: a worldwide problem

One third of the world population is infected with the Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacterium which causes tuberculosis (TB). TB, AIDS and malaria are the three infectious diseases claiming the largest number of fatalities worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that each year 8 to 10 million people become infected. TB is in particular a disease of the poor and mainly affects young adults in their most productive years. Most TB fatalities are in the developing countries, more than half of them in Asia. In almost all of these countries, multidrug-resistant TB is becoming increasingly frequent. This form of TB is very hard to treat.

Prevention is better than cure

TB treatments are expensive and also very difficult because of multidrug-resistant TB. There has therefore been a strong focus on vaccination in the fight against TB. The only vaccine on the market is Bacillus Calmette-Gu-rin (BCG). It is produced from attenuated live bovine tuberculosis bacterium, Mycobacterium bovis, which has lost its virulence in humans. In children, the vaccine prevents only half of cases of tuberculosis and in adolescents and adults the degree of protection is much lower still.

In recent years, several other candidate vaccines have been developed and some of these have been tested on humans. Only a few have led to a moderate improvement in protection compared with the BCG vaccine. The search for a more efficient vaccine is therefore still on.

Removing the bacterium's defense shield

The bacterium from which the BCG vaccine is derived hides as it were from the immune system of the organism in which it ends up. This may well be the reason why the vaccine is not very effective. The fact is that a vaccine is meant to trigger an immune reaction in order to be able to afford good protection. Nele Festjens and Nico Callewaert have discovered that the bacterium hides behind the SapM enzyme that acts as a kind of shield.

They have used this knowledge to develop a new vaccine. They adapted Mycobacterium bovis BCG in such a way that it was no longer able to generate SapM and could therefore no longer hide from the immune system. Testing the new vaccine on mice has shown that it affords better protection than the present BCG vaccine.

A different mechanism

The researchers also demonstrated that their vaccine works in a way different from the other vaccines currently being tested. In fact, it acquires its extra protective value by emitting signals that provoke inflammation and in this way activate the right cells of the immune system. Festjens and Callewaert are convinced that applying their strategy - removing the protective shield - in the new vaccines that are somewhat better than the vaccine currently being marketed should lead to a vaccine that affords genuine protection against TB.

Questions

Everyone is welcome to send questions about our research to: [email protected]

Funding

This study has partly been funded by the Marie Curie Excellence Grant (EU FP6), Methusalem, FWO, UGent and VIB.

The study was conducted by Nele Festjens and colleagues under the direction of Nico Callewaert at the VIB Department for Molecular Biomedical Research, UGent. In collaboration with Dr. Kris Huygen from the Scientific Institute of Public Health.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Rutgers study sheds light on how bedaquiline fights drug-resistant tuberculosis