Study achieves 5-fold reduction in Tc-99m sestamibi dosage for molecular breast imaging

Published in the April issue of Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Gamma Medica, Inc. and Mayo Clinic of Rochester, MN document the achievement of a 5-fold reduction in the necessary dose of Tc-99m sestamibi to perform Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI). This achievement enables the new LumaGEM™ MBI System by Gamma Medica to deliver the same low radiation dose as digital screening mammography.

The following are details of the study:

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study, conducted by Mayo Clinic of Rochester, MN, was to achieve a 5-fold reduction in the necessary dose of Tc-99m sestamibi to perform molecular breast imaging (MBI).

METHODS: Two new MBI systems were involved in the Mayo Clinic study: (1) LumaGEM™ MBI by Gamma Medica, Inc. of Northridge, CA which became commercially available in 2009 and (2) Alcyone by General Electric [GE] Medical Systems of Haifa, Israel which received FDA clearance in November, 2010. Both systems comprise dual-head pixilated Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) detectors mounted on a modified mammographic gantry. The dual-head camera design was previously shown to significantly increase detection of small breast lesions compared to a single head design.

The following 3 dose reduction methods were employed.

(1) Low-dose collimation: Optimized registered collimators were designed for each gamma camera in order to improve system sensitivity while retaining adequate spatial resolution. For both designs, hole length was shortened and septal thickness increased from standard collimation.

(2) Energy acceptance window: The standard energy window used with Tc-99m sestamibi is typically 126 - 154 keV. From Monte Carlo modeling of patient energy spectra, we determined that a lower energy window limit of 110 keV would capture a substantial proportion of misregistered photopeak events while including only a small amount of scattered events into the image.

(3) Postprocessing filters: Noise reduction algorithms were developed to generate 4 composite images (one from each CC and MLO view of each breast). A Gaussian neighborhood geometric mean (GNGM) was used to adaptively combine opposing images in order to decrease noise but retain lesion contrast. A non-local-means denoising filter was applied to the combined images. The impact of these dose reduction methods was evaluated in both phantom and patient studies.

RESULTS: Optimized collimation and widened energy window resulted in a gain in sensitivity of 3.6 for the LumaGEM and 2.8 for the Alcyone detectors. With application of all 3 dose-reduction methods, 148 MBq images had slightly fewer counts but comparable or improved signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio compared to the standard 740 MBq images. Clinical low-dose MBI studies showed comparable quality to previous standard studies and in 3 studies, mammographically occult breast cancers were detected with low-dose MBI.

CONCLUSION: Image quality obtained with low-dose MBI performed with 148 MBq Tc-99m sestamibi matches that of standard MBI performed with 740 MBq dose. Low-dose MBI presents radiation risks to the patient comparable to that of digital screening mammography, allowing its safe implementation as a screening technique.

Source:

Gamma Medica, Inc.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Study identifies cellular and molecular roots of individual brain connectivity differences