A new study finds that breast-fed babies cry more, laugh less, and generally have “more challenging temperaments” than formula-fed infants. However such behavior is normal, and mothers should learn to cope with it rather than reach for the bottle, according to researchers.
Infant irritability was said to be a natural part of the “dynamic communication” between mothers and babies say researchers. Bottle-feeding was akin to “comfort eating” – producing quieter and apparently more content babies who may be over-nourished and putting on weight too rapidly.
The study rated the temperament of 316 babies at age three months using a 191-item behavior questionnaire completed by their mothers. Scores differed between babies who were exclusively breast-fed, bottle-fed or mixed-fed. In three broad areas, breast and mixed-fed babies were rated as being more difficult to deal with than bottle-fed babies.
Babies involved in the research were among 1,526 infants enrolled into the Cambridge Baby Growth Study. Mothers assessed their babies' behavior at three months using the Revised Infant Behavior Questionnaire, a recognized method of rating various aspects of infant temperament. Of the infants, 137 were exclusively breast-fed, 88 were exclusively bottle-fed, and 91 were fed with a mixture of formula and breast milk. No differences in behavior were seen between boys and girls.
The study authors wrote in the online journal Public Library of Science ONE, “In particular, compared to formula-fed infants, breast-fed infants were reported to show greater distress, less smiling, laughing and vocalization, to be slower to calm down following distress or excitement, and more difficult to soothe by care-givers.” The findings may help explain why so many mothers give up on breastfeeding after a short time, despite the strong health message that “breast is best” for growing infants say researchers.
Department of Health guidelines say mothers should exclusively breastfeed their babies for the first six months after birth. According to a 2005 survey, three-quarters of new UK mothers start out breastfeeding their babies, but only a third are still doing so after four months.
Study leader Dr Ken Ong, from the Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit in Cambridge, urged mothers to persevere despite the difficulties, and seek help if they need it. “There is an overwhelming body of evidence supporting breastfeeding as the normal and most healthy form of infant nutrition, and our findings do not contradict this,” he said. “Bottle-fed babies may appear more content, but research suggests that these infants may be over-nourished and gain weight too quickly. Our findings are essentially similar to other stages of life; people often find that eating is comforting.”
He added, “Rather than being put off breastfeeding, parents should have more realistic expectations of normal infant behavior and should receive better understanding and support to cope with difficult infant behaviors if needed. These approaches could potentially promote successful breastfeeding, because currently many mothers attempt to breastfeed but give up after the first few weeks.”
“Humans often perceive infant crying as stress, but for infant animals irritability is a normal component of signaling to parents,” the authors wrote. “The expression of offspring demand is part of a dynamic signaling system between parents and offspring … zoologists assume that offspring transmit signals of nutritional need, and that parents respond with an appropriate transfer of food.” Crying and irritability were likely to act as an “honest signal” of nutritional need during early infancy, when a lot of energy was needed for growth, said the scientists.
They added, “Mothers who breastfeed may perceive that other people's formula-fed babies are more content, and evidence suggests that some mothers believe that the main cause of infant distress is hunger. The most consistent reason given for women to stop breastfeeding is that 'breast milk alone didn't satisfy my baby', which reflects mothers' perception of signaling by the infant. Mothers could receive more information about the behavioral dynamics of breastfeeding so as to have a better expectation and understanding of normal infant temperament and, where necessary, support to cope with difficult aspects of infant temperament.”
Dr Janine Stockdale, from the Royal College of Midwives, said, “It cannot be presumed that physical signaling by the baby automatically means it is hungry; other evidence suggests that babies engage in sucking behavior called non-nutritive sucking. The evidence needs to be seen in a greater context before we start to draw conclusions on this research and we should continue to do all we can to promote and increase the rates of breastfeeding.”
Can soda taxes fight obesity? New research adds to the debate