Ovarian cancer screening may not be needed on routine basis for all women says panel

In its latest review since 2004 of the benefits and harms of ovarian cancer screening, the United States Preventive Services Task Force found no new evidence to support routine screening.

The researchers looked at 64 studies, including controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses and found that a lack of accuracy in screening techniques leads to an inordinate number of false positives without a significant effect on mortality rates.

“Some new information on the harms of screening is available, and confirms what was suspected in 2004 about the hazards of screening — that many women could be subjected to unnecessary surgery,” the USPSTF wrote in an evidence review. “Several large screening studies currently underway should be able to provide direct evidence on the benefits of [transvaginal] screening ultrasonography or CA-125 [blood] testing in terms of mortality caused by ovarian cancer and other clinically relevant outcomes.”

A 2011 study of more than 78,000 women found diagnosis of and deaths from ovarian cancer did not differ between the group assigned to receive ovarian cancer screening (transvaginal ultrasound or (CA)-125), and a comparison group not assigned to screening. In that study, 10 percent of screened women had a false-positive test, and one third of those women had surgery to remove an ovary. A 2008 study of women in Japan found 33 surgeries were needed to diagnose one case of cancer detected by screening, the task force said. (Surgery is needed to confirm a diagnosis of ovarian cancer suggested by screening tests.)

The recommendations do not apply to women with risk factors for the condition, such as a family history of the disease or genetic mutations, such has versions of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.

The tasks force recommendations are in line with those of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which does not recommend screening for women without symptoms of the condition, and the American Cancer Society, which recommends screening for women only if they are at high risk for ovarian cancer or have persistent symptoms.

A draft of the recommendations has been posted on the task force website for public comment. The USPSTF will take public comments until May 8 before issuing final recommendations later in the year.

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Written by

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Dr. Ananya Mandal is a doctor by profession, lecturer by vocation and a medical writer by passion. She specialized in Clinical Pharmacology after her bachelor's (MBBS). For her, health communication is not just writing complicated reviews for professionals but making medical knowledge understandable and available to the general public as well.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Mandal, Ananya. (2018, August 23). Ovarian cancer screening may not be needed on routine basis for all women says panel. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 24, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120412/Ovarian-cancer-screening-may-not-be-needed-on-routine-basis-for-all-women-says-panel.aspx.

  • MLA

    Mandal, Ananya. "Ovarian cancer screening may not be needed on routine basis for all women says panel". News-Medical. 24 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120412/Ovarian-cancer-screening-may-not-be-needed-on-routine-basis-for-all-women-says-panel.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Mandal, Ananya. "Ovarian cancer screening may not be needed on routine basis for all women says panel". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120412/Ovarian-cancer-screening-may-not-be-needed-on-routine-basis-for-all-women-says-panel.aspx. (accessed November 24, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Mandal, Ananya. 2018. Ovarian cancer screening may not be needed on routine basis for all women says panel. News-Medical, viewed 24 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120412/Ovarian-cancer-screening-may-not-be-needed-on-routine-basis-for-all-women-says-panel.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Engineered SNIPRs transform CAR T-cell precision for safer cancer therapy