Editorial, opinion piece address emergence of H7N9 bird flu strain in China

The following is a summary of an editorial and an opinion piece addressing the emergence of a new strain of bird flu -- H7N9 -- in China.

  • Boston Globe: "[W]ith the rise in China of a new bird flu called H7N9, which has killed 23 people and infected over 120 more, and with one case now confirmed outside the Chinese mainland, Asian countries are also bracing for the potential outbreak of a highly lethal virus," the editorial states. "Global health depends on China being as forthcoming with information as possible, so that other nations can take appropriate precautions," the newspaper writes, adding, "By all accounts, including that of the World Health Organization, the Chinese government and state media have been more open about the spread and genetic makeup of the disease [than the country was during the SARS epidemic a decade ago], encouraging citizens to share information." The editorial concludes, "China owes the rest of the world a full account of its efforts to isolate patients and ensure that infected people don't spread the virus beyond its borders" (5/1).
  • Scott Gottlieb, Forbes: "We have grappled with deadly pockets of potent flu outbreaks before. But this one has characteristics that make it different," Gottlieb, a physician and fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, writes, adding, "There's a greater risk that this strain could acquire the ability to spread more easily from person to person." He provides statistics about the spread of the virus so far and asks, "So are we ready to battle a pandemic strain of bird flu if this new virus picks up the capacity to more efficiently spread from person to person?" He continues, "For the most part, our strategy for preparing for pandemic flu focuses on the development of vaccines," but "there's good reason to believe this may not be enough. What we really need are potent antiviral medicines with broad activity against many different strains of pandemic virus" (4/30).

http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

 

Comments

  1. David Hill David Hill United Kingdom says:

    The only way to stop this mass killer is to address it at 'source' for this is the only way to stop this human-to-human killer virus. Why does the world contend that a vaccine will come in time? Because Big Pharma says it will. This is the biggest lie of all time and where because governments are like sheep and accept this premise, 100s of millions will die this next time around.  Margaret Chan has said many times that it is only a matter of time not when. The only strategy that has worked and stopped the killer virus in its tracks  in 1997 was - avian-influenza.cirad.fr/.../...y-F-Shortridge.pdf

    When will the world wake up and see that only by addressing the virus at its 'source' will we stop several hundred million dying - The ‘prevention is better than cure' strategy and not the ‘let it happen and then we will try to cure it’ strategy, like the mindset we have presently. We have to turn that thinking around and use the same strategy as was used in Hong Kong in 1997 and kill the virus in its tracks.

    Are we so dumb to believe Big Pharma and that a vaccine will come in time. Apparently we are and where the time horizons for the Spanish Flu that took up to 100 million lives and the 2009 Swine Flu pandemic response where a vaccine came four months after in time that the Spanish Flu did its worst. Logic and intelligence says that a vaccine will come too late so let’s start adopting the only strategy that stopped it in its tracks. The reason why this has not been adopted is because there are not the tens of billions in drug sales. Who says that big Pharma is only interested in profits and not the human race - I do for one.

    Dr. David Hill
    World Innovation Foundation

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New CDC report highlights disparities in flu hospitalization and vaccination