Study shows advantages of alternative pain relief option during knee replacement surgery

Jul 26 2017

A new study led by researchers at University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire (UHCW) NHS Trust and the University of Warwick has recommended an alternative method of pain relief for patients undergoing knee replacement surgery.

Over 250 patients having knee replacements at UHCW took part in the study, reported this month in The Bone and Joint Journal, a highly-regarded specialist international publication for Orthopedic surgeons.

The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Program.

A traditional option for pain relief during knee replacement surgery is a 'femoral nerve block'; a single dose of local anesthetic injected around the femoral nerve in the groin, which is typically administered by an anesthetist.  However, a newer alternative approach uses an injection of anesthetic agents around the knee joint and is administered by the surgeon without the need for specialist equipment.

The study found that patients who had the knee injections required lower doses of powerful painkillers such as morphine after surgery.  Morphine can cause serious and troublesome side effects in postoperative patients and is best avoided if possible.  Also, unlike a femoral nerve block, there is no need for specialist equipment like ultrasound.  This is therefore likely to save surgeons and anesthetists valuable time and resources and improve patient care.

A tribute was published in the article to Mr Andrew Sprowson, a Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon at UHCW, and Associate Professor at the University of Warwick, who had been Chief Investigator in the study until his untimely death in March 2015.

Mr Peter Wall, Clinical Lecturer at UHCW NHS Trust and University of Warwick, and lead author of the report, said:

"Our study has demonstrated the advantages of injections of anesthetic agents around the knee during knee replacement surgery over other methods.  These injections are now shown to be safe and effective.  They also involve fewer resources and reduce the need for powerful painkillers such as morphine.

"This is to be welcomed as the potential risks of morphine-type pain relief are well known and should be avoided where possible.  We hope that these study findings, if put into practice, will benefit patients around the world.

"I want to emphasize the debt we owe to our late colleague Andrew Sprowson.  Without his initiative and enthusiasm, this research study would not have taken place."