Scientists call on funders to improve universal access to scientific research

Scientific research usually takes months to be published by academic journals, and once it is, many of the papers can only be read by scientists from wealthy institutes that subscribe to the journals. Over the years, there have been various attempts to make research more widely available, but most papers remain behind paywalls and scientists complain that the peer review process at journals now takes longer than ever.

In a new article publishing June 4 in the open-access journal PLOS Biology, Richard Sever and John Inglis from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory and Mike Eisen from UC Berkeley propose a new solution to these problems, which they call Plan U (for “universal”). They call on the organizations that fund research – government agencies such as NIH and charities like the Howard Hughes Medical Institute – to require the scientists they support to post drafts of their papers on free websites called “preprint servers” before submitting them to academic journals. The value of this approach was demonstrated by arXiv (pronounced “archive”), a preprint server in the physical sciences that has been running for 28 years and hosts more than a million papers. bioRxiv (pronounced “bio-archive”), founded by Sever and Inglis in 2013, brought the culture to biology and is growing rapidly as more and more biologists realize the benefits of making their work available early.

As well as making papers available sooner—and to everyone—Plan U should speed up research itself, because other experts can immediately begin building on the work. It should also stimulate evolution of the publication system.

Because preprint servers take care of dissemination, scientific journals don’t have to worry about that part and so have more freedom to experiment with how they do peer review.”

Richard Sever from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Servers reduce the barrier to entry for new initiatives, he added, since they no longer have to cover the costs of hosting the papers themselves.

Source:

PLOS

Journal reference:

Inglis, J. et al. (2019) Plan U: Universal access to scientific and medical research via funder preprint mandates. PLOS Biology. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000273.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    PLOS ONE. (2019, June 06). Scientists call on funders to improve universal access to scientific research. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 13, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20190606/Scientists-call-on-funders-to-improve-universal-access-to-scientific-research.aspx.

  • MLA

    PLOS ONE. "Scientists call on funders to improve universal access to scientific research". News-Medical. 13 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20190606/Scientists-call-on-funders-to-improve-universal-access-to-scientific-research.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    PLOS ONE. "Scientists call on funders to improve universal access to scientific research". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20190606/Scientists-call-on-funders-to-improve-universal-access-to-scientific-research.aspx. (accessed November 13, 2024).

  • Harvard

    PLOS ONE. 2019. Scientists call on funders to improve universal access to scientific research. News-Medical, viewed 13 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20190606/Scientists-call-on-funders-to-improve-universal-access-to-scientific-research.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
People with higher obsessive-compulsive symptoms tend to distrust past experience