People thinking they have had COVID-19 could increase transmission

A study conducted by researchers in the UK has found that people who think they have had COVID-19 are more likely to believe they are immune to the infection and less likely to follow social distancing rules.

The finding that these people are less likely to adhere to lockdown measures could contribute to transmission, say Louise Smith (Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London) and colleagues.

“Clear communications to this growing group are needed to explain why protective measures continue to be important and to encourage sustained adherence,” writes the team.

A pre-print version of the paper can be accessed on medRxiv*, while the article undergoes peer review.

Many countries have introduced lockdown measures

Since the COVID-19 outbreak, many countries have imposed “lockdown” measures to reduce the spread of the virus, with an estimated 3.7 billion people having been instructed to stay at home or have had their movement limited in some way.  

BARCELONA, SPAIN: First day of state of emergency and lockdown in Barcelona during coronavirus crisis. Image Credit: Kenneth Dedeu / Shutterstock
BARCELONA, SPAIN: First day of state of emergency and lockdown in Barcelona during coronavirus crisis. Image Credit: Kenneth Dedeu / Shutterstock

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Many countries are hoping that testing will guide any approaches to relaxing these measures. The tests include antigen testing, which checks for current infection and antibody testing, which identifies previous infection.

However, the World Health Organization (WHO) has cautioned against antibody testing due to concerns that people who have already had the infection will think they are immune and will stop adhering to protective measures. There is no evidence to date that previously infected individuals can not catch COVID-19 more than once and be infectious again.

The study is the first of its kind

So far, no research has investigated differences in adherence behaviors between people who think they have already had the infection and those who do not think they have.

Now, Smith and colleagues have conducted an online cross-sectional survey and collected data between 20th and 22nd April to investigate whether people who think they have already been infected tend not to follow social distancing rules as strictly as those who do not think they have. The study included 6,149 individuals living in the UK who were aged 18 years or older.

Participants were asked whether they thought they had already had coronavirus, whether they had been tested; whether they thought they were immune; how many days they had left the house over the previous week, and how worried they were about the virus. To gauge the probability of self-misdiagnosis, they were also asked what the most common symptoms of infection are.

What did the researchers find?

The study found that the proportion of people who thought they had already had COVID-19 is about twice that suggested by current estimates. However, the authors suggest that the “differences in findings may be explained by the fact that these data only cover dates until 20th April.”

About one quarter (24.3%) thought they had had COVID-19, despite only 4.0% having reported that they had tested positive for the infection.  

Of the 9.4% (n=575) who had been tested 57.4% (n=330) reported a negative result, yet 56.7% (n=187) of those individuals still believed they had been infected.

People who thought they had already been infected thought they were more likely to be then immune and were less likely to follow social distancing rules.

“In particular, people were less likely to report adhering to measures that are not allowed at all in the UK, such as meeting up with friends or family that you do not live with and shopping for nonessentials,” reports the team.

Those who believed they had already been infected were less worried about COVID-19 and less likely to identify cough and fever as two of the three main symptoms.

What are the implications of the study?

The researchers warn that the number of people who believe they have had COVID-19 will only increase as time goes on and that it is essential to understand how this impacts behaviors.

The authors point out that due to the cross-sectional nature of the study, causality cannot be evaluated, but that “the findings do fit with concerns expressed by the WHO that believing oneself to have had COVID-19 results in reduced adherence to protective behaviors.”

The teams say the findings have important implications since social norms can affect whether people adhere to lockdown measures:

“People may be less likely to adhere to “lockdown” measures if they perceive other people, such as those who think they have had COVID-19, not to be adhering. To date, there are no communications specifically targeting those who think they have had COVID-19.”

“Clear, targeted communications” are needed

Smith and colleagues say this will become an increasingly important issue, the longer the pandemic continues.

“Communications should acknowledge the growing proportion of the population who think that they have had COVID-19,” they warn.

“Clear, targeted communications might be used to advise this constantly growing group both to reduce reliance on self-diagnosis in the absence of a test and to provide advice on what behavior changes, if any, are advisable,” concludes the team.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • Mar 6 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Sally Robertson

Written by

Sally Robertson

Sally first developed an interest in medical communications when she took on the role of Journal Development Editor for BioMed Central (BMC), after having graduated with a degree in biomedical science from Greenwich University.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Robertson, Sally. (2023, March 06). People thinking they have had COVID-19 could increase transmission. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 21, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200506/People-thinking-they-have-had-COVID-19-could-increase-transmission.aspx.

  • MLA

    Robertson, Sally. "People thinking they have had COVID-19 could increase transmission". News-Medical. 21 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200506/People-thinking-they-have-had-COVID-19-could-increase-transmission.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Robertson, Sally. "People thinking they have had COVID-19 could increase transmission". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200506/People-thinking-they-have-had-COVID-19-could-increase-transmission.aspx. (accessed November 21, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Robertson, Sally. 2023. People thinking they have had COVID-19 could increase transmission. News-Medical, viewed 21 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200506/People-thinking-they-have-had-COVID-19-could-increase-transmission.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New study reveals long-term brainstem damage in COVID-19 survivors using advanced MRI scans