Migrant workers contribute to the spread of COVID-19 in India’s villages

India's lockdown may have hastened spread of COVID-19 to rural areas as millions of migrant workers, trapped in the big cities, ended up being exposed to the virus — which they carried into their distant villages when finally allowed to return.

Pavitra Mohan, co-founder of Aajeevika Bureau, a non-profit that provides healthcare to migrant workers in the desert state of Rajasthan, is clear that the lockdown, from 24 March to 4 May, contributed to the spread of the virus into India's vast hinterland, where nearly 70 percent of the country's 1.3 billion people live.

The lockdown, declared with only a four-hour notice, left some 200 million migrant workers stranded in cities. Suddenly unemployed and evicted by their landlords, they were left with little choice but to start marching home. Administrations also failed to recognize that migrant workers generally live in cramped quarters, where physical distancing is impossible, and they have little access to healthcare. Hundreds perished along the way from starvation, exhaustion or being struck by speeding vehicles on the highways and by goods trains on railway tracks.

A study done by Aajeevika Bureau on migrant workers who managed to return to Rajasthan in the early phase of the lockdown from 24 March to 15 April showed that none of them were infected. In contrast, many of those who returned to Rajasthan after 4 May, when the government allowed movement, were found carrying the virus.

The study provides a template to track the movement of the virus and also takes a closer look at the plight of millions of migrant workers who moved back from the cities to their homes in the other major labor-sending states of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and Jharkhand.

Migrants who were held back in the cities when the COVID-19 pandemic was raging there picked up the infection, and when they were allowed to go home carried the virus to the rural areas of Rajasthan and to other labor-sending states."

Pavitra Mohan, Co-founder of Aajeevika Bureau

Aajeevika Bureau estimates that about 300,000 migrants returned to Rajasthan in the first phase, and again between 4 May and 15 June. The two distinct waves afforded a chance to make a comparative study.

"Allowing migrant workers a chance to return home using the road and railway networks, before imposing the lockdown on 24 March, would certainly have helped contain the virus within the metropolises and urban centers," says Mohan.

According to Mohan, migrant workers are wary of returning to the cities after such shabby treatment, preferring meager earning from smallholder farming to the unhealthy, slave-like conditions offered them there.

On the positive side, the sudden shortage of labor in the cities has compelled employers and authorities to finally recognize the value of migrant workers and consider providing them just remuneration and better living conditions.

Source:

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Could vitamin D help COVID-19 patients? Meta-analysis highlights potential ICU reduction