Rapid CD169 assay for COVID-19 screening

Researchers in France have conducted a study demonstrating the sensitivity of a rapid flow cytometry assay that could be used to screen for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

The assay detects the upregulation of whole blood monocyte CD169, which has been reported as a marker of viral infections.

This rapid assay was more sensitive than the currently used method and less likely to produce false-negative results, especially among early and asymptomatic patients.

The researchers say the diagnostic accuracy, easy finger-prick sampling, and rapid results (15-30 minutes) point to whole blood monocyte CD169 upregulation as a potential new biomarker for COVID-19 screening.

Screening for monocyte CD169 upregulation could decrease the pressure health systems are currently under, reduce overall costs, and make sample collection easier for a significant number of people, says the team.

The study was conducted by researchers from Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Marseille (APMH); IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, Aix-Marseille University and Beckman Coulter, Marseille.

The findings can be accessed on the server medRxiv* while the article undergoes peer review.

Expression of neutrophil CD64 and monocyte HLA-DR in CoVID-19 patients as a function of disease stage. Box plots summarizing the level of CD64 index (ratio of neutrophil vs lymphocyte signals) (A) and HLA-DR signal on monocytes (B) in CoVID-19 patients at an early stage, at a late stage, or asymptomatic, are shown. Box-and-whisker plots come from the first to the third quartile and are cut by the median; segments at the end are extreme values.
Expression of neutrophil CD64 and monocyte HLA-DR in CoVID-19 patients as a function of disease stage. Box plots summarizing the level of CD64 index (ratio of neutrophil vs lymphocyte signals) (A) and HLA-DR signal on monocytes (B) in CoVID-19 patients at an early stage, at a late stage, or asymptomatic, are shown. Box-and-whisker plots come from the first to the third quartile and are cut by the median; segments at the end are extreme values.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

COVID-19 has spread at an unprecedented rate

Since the COVID-19 outbreak began in Wuhan, China, late last year, the causative agent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread at an unprecedented rate, infecting more than 43.6 million people and killing more than 1.1 million.

Many countries have introduced mass diagnostic testing intending to selectively isolate infected individuals.

“Ideally, this should allow any person to receive a prompt and straightforward answer at the time of symptom onset or contact tracing,” say Moïse Michel (APMH) and colleagues.

The current method of detection

Currently, the method used is the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, which detects viral RNA in a nasopharyngeal sample.

However, as well as being a relatively expensive test, the sensitivity of RT-PCR is not optimal, mainly due to the delay between exposure to infection and colonization of the upper ear, nose, and throat area.

Furthermore, although RT-PCR is a fairly fast technique (1 to a few hours), the strain placed on laboratories is significantly delaying sample processing and the delivery of results. The deep nasal swabbing involved is also uncomfortable for the patient and potentially dangerous for the person taking the sample.

Markers of leukocyte activation could help

“In this context, harnessing immune markers of leukocyte activation is a promising tool,” say the researchers. “Indeed, leukocytes detect and rapidly respond to infection with secreted and surface activation molecules.”

CD169 upregulation has been detected in patients with many viruses, including HIV, Ebola, Dengue, and Zika, and mass cytometry studies have now identified CD169 as a relevant biomarker for COVID-19.

Testing monocyte CD169 upregulation as a biomarker of infection

Now, Michel and the team have tested the COVID-19 diagnostic efficacy of a rapid and affordable flow cytometry rapid assay they developed to measure whole blood monocyte CD169 upregulation.

They tested the assay in a large cohort (n=177) of patients with RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Whole blood CD169 testing was carried out in parallel with RT-PCR screening for SARS-CoV-2.

The cohort was divided into three groups: 80 patients with early-stage infection (≤14 days after symptom onset; group 1), 71 with late-stage infection (≥15 days; group 2), and 26 with asymptomatic infection (group 3).

The CD169 assay was more sensitive than RT-PCR

Whole blood monocyte CD169 evaluation demonstrated greater sensitivity than RT-PCR, particularly among early-stage, asymptomatic patients.

In group 1 (early stage; n=80), the CD169 index was higher than the established 3.5 thresholds in 80% (64) of patients, while RT-PCR detected the virus in 65% (52) of patients.

In group 3 (asymptomatic infection; n=26), significant CD169 upregulation was detected in 46% (12) of patients at levels similar to those observed in group 1, while RT-PCR detected the virus in 35% (9) of patients.

The CD169 assay demonstrated a 98% sensitivity in early-stage disease and a 100% sensitivity in asymptomatic infection. However, the assay did not demonstrate high specificity in late-stage disease, suggesting that CD169 expression decreases once the virus has cleared.

A potential screening strategy

The researchers say the findings show that a testing strategy leveraging monocyte CD169 upregulation as a triage test could be designed.

“Screening for monocyte CD169 upregulation could alleviate the load on specialized RT-PCR services and reduce overall costs while making the sample collection step easier for the greatest number of people,” concludes the team.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • Jul 23 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Sally Robertson

Written by

Sally Robertson

Sally first developed an interest in medical communications when she took on the role of Journal Development Editor for BioMed Central (BMC), after having graduated with a degree in biomedical science from Greenwich University.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Robertson, Sally. (2023, July 23). Rapid CD169 assay for COVID-19 screening. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 21, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201027/Rapid-CD169-assay-for-COVID-19-screening.aspx.

  • MLA

    Robertson, Sally. "Rapid CD169 assay for COVID-19 screening". News-Medical. 21 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201027/Rapid-CD169-assay-for-COVID-19-screening.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Robertson, Sally. "Rapid CD169 assay for COVID-19 screening". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201027/Rapid-CD169-assay-for-COVID-19-screening.aspx. (accessed November 21, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Robertson, Sally. 2023. Rapid CD169 assay for COVID-19 screening. News-Medical, viewed 21 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201027/Rapid-CD169-assay-for-COVID-19-screening.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Mucosal COVID-19 boosters outperform mRNA shots in preventing upper airway infections