Natural selection and adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 in mammals

Researchers of the Hubei University of Medicine, China, have analyzed several mutations in different variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from mammal species that suggest natural selection and host adaptation are occurring in the virus.

A pre-print version of the research paper is available to read in full on the bioRxiv*server.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Context

SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which continues to be a global crisis.

While the virus can transmit from human-to-human hosts easily, multiple cases of human-to-animal and animal-to-human transmission have also been observed.

A wide range of animals has been observed or suspected to be susceptible to the virus. Cats, dogs, lions, tigers, gorillas, snow leopards, white-tailed deer, ferrets and mink have all tested positive for having acquired SARS-CoV-2.

Most notably, mink in farms in The Netherlands were reported to be contracting the virus from humans, but then also transmitting the virus both to mink and back to humans.

Thus, keeping the spread of the virus under control is essential to prevent local outbreaks in both wild and captive animal populations. Acknowledging the mutations SARS-CoV-2 variant strains acquire in different animal species is also crucial in achieving this goal.

The study

Professor Long Liu, of the Hubei University of Medicine, and colleagues analyzed multiple variants of SARS-CoV-2 found in different mammal species and compared these to the initial “Wuhan” circulating strain of the virus during the first wave of the pandemic.

The team used SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences from humans, cats, dogs, tigers, lions, ferrets and mink.

These sequences were used to construct a phylogenetic tree to infer the evolutionary history of the viral genomes. The researchers then used an adaptive evolution server (Datamonkey) to identify branches where the virus had been under selective pressure.

Following this, Liu and colleagues used the codon adaptive index (CAI) to assess the variety of mutations between the different variants.

SARS-CoV-2 binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), an enzyme located on the outside of (primarily) respiratory cells, to access the cell. The researchers recreated the structures of human ACE2 and the crystal complex of SARS-CoV-2 to model binding efficiency between variants. Structures of mink ACE2 and the mink viral spike were also constructed and used in the analysis.

Results

The researchers found that SARS-CoV-2 of the mink cluster group had more substitution mutations compared to the reference strain.

Substitutions of cytidine in mink-CoV account for nearly 50% of the substitutions, while in other animals, cytidine accounts for only 30% of the substitutions,” say the authors, “The substitution of adenine in SARS-CoV-2 in other animals is threefold higher than that in mink-CoV.”

Cytidine-to-uracil mutations occurred over 40% of the time and 8x more so than mutations of the reverse. Substitution of adenine and guanine was also 3x higher in nonsynonymous mutations than in synonymous mutations.

Notable and convergent mutations were also observed in the spike protein of the mink SARS-CoV-2 variants. Variations in the spike protein were observed in all variants for animal species from the reference strain, D614G and A222V, most commonly found. The researchers found that these sites, as well as sites 262 and 439, were exposed to strong positive selective pressure, while other sites (294, 413, 1018 and 1100) were negatively selected for.

Composition and substitution analysis of SARS-CoV-2 isolated from animals. (A) The evolutionary entropy of specific sites on the SARS-CoV-2 genome in all the GISAID sequences on February 1, 2021. (B) The reported animals infected with SARS-CoV-2 and the defined transmission route from human to animal. (C) Phylogenetic tree using the maximum likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model performed by MEGA-X. The tree was provided with 500 bootstraps. (D) The proportions of uracil, guanine, thymine, and cytidine substitutions (nonsynonymous) in mink SARS-CoV-2 and other animals were separately counted. (E) Base pair changes observed in the mink SARS-CoV-2 genomes. All transitions and transversions were recorded and analyzed (see Supplementary Table S2). (F) The synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions of mink-CoV were counted and analyzed. (G) The relative proportions of all transitions and transversions were separately analyzed.
Composition and substitution analysis of SARS-CoV-2 isolated from animals. (A) The evolutionary entropy of specific sites on the SARS-CoV-2 genome in all the GISAID sequences on February 1, 2021. (B) The reported animals infected with SARS-CoV-2 and the defined transmission route from human to animal. (C) Phylogenetic tree using the maximum likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model performed by MEGA-X. The tree was provided with 500 bootstraps. (D) The proportions of uracil, guanine, thymine, and cytidine substitutions (nonsynonymous) in mink SARS-CoV-2 and other animals were separately counted. (E) Base pair changes observed in the mink SARS-CoV-2 genomes. All transitions and transversions were recorded and analyzed (see Supplementary Table S2). (F) The synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions of mink-CoV were counted and analyzed. (G) The relative proportions of all transitions and transversions were separately analyzed.

To determine the optimization of SARS-CoV-2 to hosts, the researchers calculated the average CAI of the spike region and the full genome of the virus. Higher CAI scores correspond to increased host optimization; these scores were lower (compared to humans) in pangolins, cats, dogs, tigers, and lions, but higher in bat hosts.

Mink SARS-CoV-2 additionally showed greater preference for mink ACE2 over human ACE2, following mutation at site 453 from Y453 (found in humans) to F453.

Concluding remarks

SARS-CoV-2 is suspected to have had a zoonotic origin, from either bat or pangolin coronaviruses. Its willingness to jump intraspecies hosts should be of great concern.

Professor Liu and her team have identified evidence for natural selection and host adaptation in SARS-CoV-2 in mink, with a great number of variations also found between other mammal hosts. Thus, understanding these mutations and the selective pressures that drive them is critical in preventing ecological outbreaks or new variants of the virus from arising.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • Apr 8 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Michael Burgess

Written by

Michael Burgess

Michael graduated with a first-class degree in Zoology from the University of Hull, and later received a Masters degree in Palaeobiology from the University of Bristol.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Burgess, Michael. (2023, April 08). Natural selection and adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 in mammals. News-Medical. Retrieved on December 23, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210406/Natural-selection-and-adaptation-of-SARS-CoV-2-in-mammals.aspx.

  • MLA

    Burgess, Michael. "Natural selection and adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 in mammals". News-Medical. 23 December 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210406/Natural-selection-and-adaptation-of-SARS-CoV-2-in-mammals.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Burgess, Michael. "Natural selection and adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 in mammals". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210406/Natural-selection-and-adaptation-of-SARS-CoV-2-in-mammals.aspx. (accessed December 23, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Burgess, Michael. 2023. Natural selection and adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 in mammals. News-Medical, viewed 23 December 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210406/Natural-selection-and-adaptation-of-SARS-CoV-2-in-mammals.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Long-COVID lingers in children