Primate study shows benefit of mRNA vaccine booster shot against SARS-CoV-2 variants

In a recent bioRxiv* preprint research paper, a large group of US scientists demonstrate how a booster dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine can substantially improve both the potency and range of neutralizing antibody responses and mediate protection against upper and lower airway infection by a range of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern – even those relatively resistant to in vitro neutralization.

The SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna), which is widely used around the world as a way to protect against coronavirus disease (COVID-19), shows between 90-100% protection against wild type (WA-1) strain or alpha/beta variants when given in two doses four weeks apart and appraised within a two-month window.

However, viral variants of concern have surfaced since the vaccine has been authorized for emergency use, and we know that the beta variant is the one most resistant to neutralization. It is still unclear how exactly this resistance can influence the longevity of protective immunity in humans.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Open questions regarding a booster dose

Recently, clinical reports from Israel have shown that those immunized with the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine (which is another mRNA vaccine) more than six months ago may actually present with symptomatic disease when infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

Consequently, these data imply that it may be necessary to boost antibody responses – especially against viral variants of concern – in order to sustain adequate protection against severe forms of COVID-19. This is pertinent not only for at-risk cohorts but also to reduce the potential for further viral transmission.

One very important question is whether the additional vaccine boost should be matched to a specific new variant of concern (heterologous), or actually homologous boosting using the original vaccine based on ancestral strains will be adequate for generating broadly neutralizing antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

As nonhuman primates have proven to be a very useful model for assessing protection and immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 during vaccine development, a research group led by Dr. Kizzmekia S. Corbett from the National Institutes of Health in Maryland (USA) has been able to pursue a study on the effectiveness of booster shots against SARS-CoV-2 beta variant.

Temporal serum antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants. Rhesus macaques (n = 8/group) were immunized according to Figure S1. Sera were collected at weeks 6, 24 or 29, 31, and 37 and assessed, where applicable, for SARS-CoV-2 WA-1 (black), b (red), and P.1 – gamma, g (green), B.1.429 – epsilon, e (purple), B.1.526 – iota, i (orange), and B.1.617.2 – delta, d (blue) S-specific (A-B) and RBD-specific (C-D) IgG by MULTI-ARRAY ELISA, lentiviral-based pseudovirus neutralization (E-F), VSV-based pseudovirus neutralization (G-H), live virus neutralization (I-J), and WA-1 S-specific antibody avidity (K-L). Lines represent geometric mean titer (GMT) and geometric error. Dotted lines indicate neutralization assay limits of detection. Arrows point to immunization timepoints.
Temporal serum antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants. Rhesus macaques (n = 8/group) were immunized according to Figure S1. Sera were collected at weeks 6, 24 or 29, 31, and 37 and assessed, where applicable, for SARS-CoV-2 WA-1 (black), b (red), and P.1 – gamma, g (green), B.1.429 – epsilon, e (purple), B.1.526 – iota, i (orange), and B.1.617.2 – delta, d (blue) S-specific (A-B) and RBD-specific (C-D) IgG by MULTI-ARRAY ELISA, lentiviral-based pseudovirus neutralization (E-F), VSV-based pseudovirus neutralization (G-H), live virus neutralization (I-J), and WA-1 S-specific antibody avidity (K-L). Lines represent geometric mean titer (GMT) and geometric error. Dotted lines indicate neutralization assay limits of detection. Arrows point to immunization timepoints.

A study on nonhuman primates

In this study, nonhuman primates were immunized with the clinically relevant mRNA-1273 vaccine regimen and then boosted approximately six months later with either homologous mRNA-1273 or heterologous mRNA-1273.b vaccine (the latter being specific for the beta variant).

Immune responses (i.e., antibody, B cell, and T cell) were appraised temporally in order to evaluate how boosting with mRNA-1273 or mRNA92 1273.b actually influences the magnitude of WA-1 or beta-specific immune responses (both in the serum and mucosa), as well as protection against the challenge with SARS-CoV-2 beta variant of concern.

At the end of the experiment, animals were euthanized while their lung tissue was processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for routine histopathology analysis. All of those samples were blinded and evaluated by an expert veterinary pathologist.

One boost to stop them all

In a nutshell, the researchers have shown that boosting with the homologous mRNA-1273 vaccine six months after primary immunization results in up to a 20-fold increase in neutralizing antibody responses across all variants of concern, which may be necessary for high-level protection against severe COVID-19 – particularly for at-risk populations.

Importantly, a significant boosting of neutralizing responses was observed against the beta variant even when there were undetectable responses prior to the boost. Moreover, neutralizing responses after the boost were significantly higher than peak titers after the primary vaccination series.

A noteworthy finding was a somewhat limited (i.e., less than 5%) frequency of B cells specific for beta variant only following mRNA vaccination or after either homologous or heterologous boost. However, naïve animals primed with only mRNA-1273.β demonstrated between 25-40% of the total B-cell response specific for beta variant only; this shows how future mRNA vaccines should be designed to imprint B cell repertoires.

Potential clinical utility

The data reported in this study demonstrate that a booster dose can significantly improve both the potency and range of neutralizing antibody responses, which is then sufficient to bestow protection against upper and lower airway infection by a challenge virus that is relatively resistant to in vitro neutralization.

“We speculate that new variants with high viral load and transmissibility, such as delta variant, may require a late boost to increase antibody responses in the upper airway enough to limit transmission”, say study authors in this bioRxiv paper.

“Furthermore, if such variants have more rapid progression to lower airway disease than prior strains, boosting may be more important for mitigating severe disease as serum antibody wanes, because disease progression may outpace otherwise protective anamnestic responses”, they add.

In conclusion, the likely clinical utility of a booster shot would be to support high-level protection against severe forms of the disease and limit the duration/extent of milder infections in the setting of disappearing immunity. This is especially pertinent for older people and those with pre-existing health conditions.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • Apr 12 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Dr. Tomislav Meštrović

Written by

Dr. Tomislav Meštrović

Dr. Tomislav Meštrović is a medical doctor (MD) with a Ph.D. in biomedical and health sciences, specialist in the field of clinical microbiology, and an Assistant Professor at Croatia's youngest university - University North. In addition to his interest in clinical, research and lecturing activities, his immense passion for medical writing and scientific communication goes back to his student days. He enjoys contributing back to the community. In his spare time, Tomislav is a movie buff and an avid traveler.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Meštrović, Tomislav. (2023, April 12). Primate study shows benefit of mRNA vaccine booster shot against SARS-CoV-2 variants. News-Medical. Retrieved on December 22, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210816/Primate-study-shows-benefit-of-mRNA-vaccine-booster-shot-against-SARS-CoV-2-variants.aspx.

  • MLA

    Meštrović, Tomislav. "Primate study shows benefit of mRNA vaccine booster shot against SARS-CoV-2 variants". News-Medical. 22 December 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210816/Primate-study-shows-benefit-of-mRNA-vaccine-booster-shot-against-SARS-CoV-2-variants.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Meštrović, Tomislav. "Primate study shows benefit of mRNA vaccine booster shot against SARS-CoV-2 variants". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210816/Primate-study-shows-benefit-of-mRNA-vaccine-booster-shot-against-SARS-CoV-2-variants.aspx. (accessed December 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Meštrović, Tomislav. 2023. Primate study shows benefit of mRNA vaccine booster shot against SARS-CoV-2 variants. News-Medical, viewed 22 December 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210816/Primate-study-shows-benefit-of-mRNA-vaccine-booster-shot-against-SARS-CoV-2-variants.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Skin-friendly bacteria could revolutionize vaccination