Three doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination safe in high-risk populations

Earlier reports have suggested the high effectiveness of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccines at preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, their efficacy against mild COVID-19 disease appears to wane over time. Thus, the need for additional/booster vaccine doses is being contemplated.

Study: Three doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination are safe based on adverse events reported in electronic health records. Image Credit: natka_u_a / Shutterstock.com

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

An additional vaccine dose may particularly benefit individuals at high risk of breakthrough infections or severe COVID-19, like immunocompromised patients. Nevertheless, it is necessary to monitor the safety of additional vaccine doses.

Extensive research has shown that the standard two-dose regimen of mRNA-based COVID19 vaccines is safe. Data from smaller trials depict that additional vaccination doses might also be safe.

About the study

A new study published on the medRxiv* preprint server aimed to determine the safety of additional vaccine doses among individuals who previously received the standard two-dose regimen of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines.

This retrospective study included adults within the Mayo Clinic Enterprise who were vaccinated with three doses of United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines from December 1, 2020, to October 17, 2021. Participants received the first two doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 according to the emergency use authorization (EUA) protocol.

The study participants were administered a third dose of the same vaccine type as the original two doses at least 28 days after the second dose. All subjects were followed up for at least 14 days after their third vaccine dose.

Demographic and tracked comorbidities of the study participants.

Study findings

No significant difference was observed in the reporting of severe adverse events; however, there was a significant increase in reporting for most low-severity adverse events after the patients received the third COVID-19 vaccine dose as compared to the previous doses.

The most common adverse events reported after the third vaccine dose were fatigue (4.92%), lymphadenopathy (2.89%), nausea (2.62%), headache (2.47%), arthralgia (2.12%), myalgia (1.99%), diarrhea (1.70%), erythema (1%), fever (1.11%), vomiting (1.10%), chills (0.47%), and soreness (0.36%).

Upon utilizing the risk difference (RD), it was found that aS compared to the second dose, there was increased reporting of the most common adverse events for both BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines after the third dose. Yet, no vaccine-specific adverse events were recorded.

Comparatively, reporting of severe adverse events was rare after the third dose and was not significantly higher than the frequency of events reported after the second dose. After the third vaccine dose, four patients reported pericarditis, two patients reported anaphylaxis, and one patient reported myocarditis. Moreover, the significant risk for these adverse events did not appear to have increased after the third dose than that after the second dose.

Upon assessing the rate of emergency department visits, there was only a slight increase within two days after the third BNT162b2 dose, which amounted to 0.29% of vaccine recipients, when compared to after the second dose that reported a rate of 0.2%. Meanwhile, no significant difference in emergency department visits was recorded among mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients.

Emergency department visits within 2 days of each vaccine dose. The percentage of 3-dose mRNA vaccine recipients that visited the emergency department within 2 days after the 1st dose (yellow), 2nd dose (orange), or 3rd dose (red), compared with a 2-day period, starting 14-days before their 1st dose (blue). Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals, and asterisks indicate a significant (two-tailed p-value < 0.05) difference in emergency department visits after vaccination compared with before.

The findings of the current study suggest that a third dose of the same type of vaccine, after either a BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 primary series, is safe. An increase in the early post-vaccination adverse events was recorded after the third dose as compared to earlier doses. However, these were symptoms of low concern including fatigue, lymphadenopathy, nausea, and diarrhea.

There was no significant increase in electronic health records (EHR) reporting of severe adverse events after a third vaccine dose as compared to after the second dose with an incidence rate compared with previous literature.

Conclusion

The increase in minor adverse events could be due to a stronger immune response elicited by the third vaccine dose as compared to the second and first doses.

The current study provides further evidence that the third dose of COVID-19 vaccination with the same mRNA vaccine, as used in the primary series, is safe in high-risk populations. This study confirms previous findings that propose booster dose safety and effectiveness, while also supporting the implementation of the third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination for at-risk populations.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • May 8 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Nidhi Saha

Written by

Nidhi Saha

I am a medical content writer and editor. My interests lie in public health awareness and medical communication. I have worked as a clinical dentist and as a consultant research writer in an Indian medical publishing house. It is my constant endeavor is to update knowledge on newer treatment modalities relating to various medical fields. I have also aided in proofreading and publication of manuscripts in accredited medical journals. I like to sketch, read and listen to music in my leisure time.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Saha, Nidhi. (2023, May 08). Three doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination safe in high-risk populations. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 19, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211115/Three-doses-of-COVID-19-mRNA-vaccination-safe-in-high-risk-populations.aspx.

  • MLA

    Saha, Nidhi. "Three doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination safe in high-risk populations". News-Medical. 19 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211115/Three-doses-of-COVID-19-mRNA-vaccination-safe-in-high-risk-populations.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Saha, Nidhi. "Three doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination safe in high-risk populations". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211115/Three-doses-of-COVID-19-mRNA-vaccination-safe-in-high-risk-populations.aspx. (accessed November 19, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Saha, Nidhi. 2023. Three doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination safe in high-risk populations. News-Medical, viewed 19 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211115/Three-doses-of-COVID-19-mRNA-vaccination-safe-in-high-risk-populations.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Public trust in COVID-19 vaccine science influences vaccine uptake in the US