Extended interval between second and third vaccination beneficial against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant

In a recent preprint study posted to the bioRxiv* preprint server, researchers evaluated antibody neutralization of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant by testing the serum from convalescent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) individuals and inactivated or protein subunit vaccine recipients.

Study: Reduced sera neutralization to Omicron SARS-CoV-2 by both inactivated and protein subunit vaccines and the convalescents. Image Credit: Tong_stocker/ShutterstockStudy: Reduced sera neutralization to Omicron SARS-CoV-2 by both inactivated and protein subunit vaccines and the convalescents. Image Credit: Tong_stocker/Shutterstock

Significance of Omicron variant

*Important notice: bioRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 is a major threat to public health across the world. On November 24, 2021, the first case of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern (VOC) was reported and soon after, Omicron cases were reported across 58 countries and regions worldwide.

The reduced antibody neutralization of the Omicron variant is of concern as they have 32 spike (S) protein mutations with 15 of them in the receptor-binding domain (RBD). The efficiency of COVID-19 vaccines in clinical use against the Omicron variant needs to be evaluated as the new strain spreads rapidly.

The study

The present study, conducted in China, determined the serum antibody neutralizing capacity against the Omicron variant. The serum antibodies from 16 convalescent COVID-19 patients and those who received either protein subunit or inactivated COVID-19 vaccines were evaluated for the binding antibody titers and neutralization antibody titers.

The vaccines received by the participants include CoronaVac from Sinovac, or ZF2001 from Zhifei longcom, or BBIBP-CoV from Sinopharm, where ZF2001 is a protein subunit vaccine and the other two are inactivated COVID-19 vaccines. The vaccine recipients included in the study had received three doses of either protein subunit or inactivated COVID-19 vaccines.

Serum from ZF2001 vaccines were divided into two groups: individuals with a shorter duration between the second and third vaccine doses (vaccine shots at zero, one, and two months) and individuals with a longer duration between the doses (vaccine shots at zero, one, and around five months). Those who received inactivated COVID-19 vaccines had their third dose after six months of the second dose.

The binding antibody titers (IgG) from the serum samples were analyzed with trimeric S proteins of Omicron or SARS-CoV-2 prototype (WH-01) using enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). Similarly, the binding of NAb in serum samples against VOCs including Omicron, Alpha, Beta, and Delta and SARS-CoV-2 prototype (WH-01) were tested by pseudovirus neutralization assay and were repeated twice.

Results

The results of the pseudovirus neutralization assay show that the serum antibodies in 15 out of 16 convalescent patients were negative for Nabs against the Omicron variant, while the neutralizing capacity was substantially better preserved in vaccine recipients.

The neutralizing capacity against Omicron was preserved in 62.5% of participants who received a three-dose inactivated vaccine regimen, 56.25% of participants from the ZF2001 vaccine group with a shorter duration between the second and third doses, whereas the neutralizing capacity was preserved in 100% of the ZF2001 vaccine group with four to six months duration between the second and third dose.

When NAb titer against Omicron variant was compared to the SARS-CoV-2 prototype, convalescent patients had a 17.4 times reduction, the ZF2001 vaccine group with a shorter duration between the second and third doses had a 10.6 times reduction, the inactivated vaccine group had a 5.1 times reduction, and the ZF2001 vaccine group with four to six months duration between the second and third dose had only a 3.1-fold reduction from SARS-CoV-2 prototype to Omicron variant.

The binding antibody titers against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in the three-dose inactivated vaccine group had no significant decline, whereas that in the two groups of ZF2001 vaccine recipients showed a significant decrease when analyzed by the ELISA test.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that antibody neutralization against the Omicron variant is lower in convalescent COVID-19 patients compared to those who received a three-dose regimen of either inactivated or protein subunit vaccines. The ZF2001 vaccine recipients with longer periods between second and third doses showed 100% neutralization against the Omicron variant.

Based on the findings, the authors proposed a multi-boost vaccine strategy with a longer duration between the second and third dose, as that would be beneficial in acquiring immunity against severely mutated SARS-CoV-2 variants including the Omicron variant.

Overall, the study recommends a booster dose of vaccine for those who had received a two-dose vaccine regimen and SARS-CoV-2 convalescent patients. In the case of vaccines like ZF2001, BBIBP-CoV, and CoronaVac that have a three-dose regimen, an extended duration between the second and third dose is recommended. Further studies with real-world information are required to determine the need for next-generation vaccines with vast protection.

*Important notice: bioRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

Journal reference:
Shanet Susan Alex

Written by

Shanet Susan Alex

Shanet Susan Alex, a medical writer, based in Kerala, India, is a Doctor of Pharmacy graduate from Kerala University of Health Sciences. Her academic background is in clinical pharmacy and research, and she is passionate about medical writing. Shanet has published papers in the International Journal of Medical Science and Current Research (IJMSCR), the International Journal of Pharmacy (IJP), and the International Journal of Medical Science and Applied Research (IJMSAR). Apart from work, she enjoys listening to music and watching movies.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Susan Alex, Shanet. (2021, December 22). Extended interval between second and third vaccination beneficial against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 17, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211222/Extended-interval-between-second-and-third-vaccination-beneficial-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-variant.aspx.

  • MLA

    Susan Alex, Shanet. "Extended interval between second and third vaccination beneficial against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant". News-Medical. 17 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211222/Extended-interval-between-second-and-third-vaccination-beneficial-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-variant.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Susan Alex, Shanet. "Extended interval between second and third vaccination beneficial against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211222/Extended-interval-between-second-and-third-vaccination-beneficial-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-variant.aspx. (accessed November 17, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Susan Alex, Shanet. 2021. Extended interval between second and third vaccination beneficial against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. News-Medical, viewed 17 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211222/Extended-interval-between-second-and-third-vaccination-beneficial-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-variant.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Leritrelvir shows high efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 protease mutations