Researchers report loss of antibody potency against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant

In a recent study published on the bioRxiv* server, researchers find that vaccine-mediated protection against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is significantly reduced against the Omicron variant.

Study: Variable loss of antibody potency against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron). Image Credit: Orpheus FX / Shutterstock.com

Study: Variable loss of antibody potency against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron). Image Credit: Orpheus FX / Shutterstock.com

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Introduction

SARS-CoV-2, which is the etiological agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has undergone several mutations that have led to the emergence of numerous variants around the world. Despite high COVID-19 vaccine coverage in many nations, multiple breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections have still been reported in these countries.

In November 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant was initially identified. Soon after its initial discovery, Omicron quickly began replacing the highly transmissible Delta variant (B.1.617.2) as the dominant circulating strain in many countries around the world.

As compared to the original strain of SARS-CoV-2, the Omicron variant consists of two deletions, one insertion, and 30 amino acid differences in its viral spike protein. Notably, many of the mutations found in the Omicron variant have previously been identified to or confer resistance to neutralizing antibodies.

Extensive research regarding the antigenic shift and pathogenesis of the Omicron variant, as well as the ensuing human immune response, is currently being conducted. Due to the rapid spread of the Omicron variant across the world, despite vaccinations and mitigation protocols, it is crucial to understand the potential ability of this new strain of SARS-CoV-2 to evade neutralizing antibodies that are elicited by both vaccines and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

About the study

Using a pseudotyped virus assay, the researchers in the current study characterized the sensitivity of the Omicron variant neutralization by a diverse set of samples. These samples included relevant monoclonal antibodies, pooled serum from vaccine recipients, serum samples from infected and infected-then-vaccinated healthcare workers, as well as a random sample of recent seropositive blood donors.

Study findings

The researchers evaluated the sensitivity of the Omicron variant to neutralization by several monoclonal antibodies currently being used to treat COVID-19 patients, including REGN10933, REGN10987, Ly-CoV016, Ly-CoV555, and S309, the latter of which was a parent antibody of Sotrovimab. Unfortunately, the Omicron variant was resistant to neutralization by REGN10933, REGN10987, Ly-CoV016, and Ly-CoV555, even when the highest concentration of 10 micrograms (μg)/ml was tested. However, S309 was found to retain much of its neutralizing activity against the variant, despite experiencing a two-fold loss in its potency.

Antibodies elicited by a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection with the original wild-type strain of the virus exhibited a reduced neutralization against the Omicron variant. This reduction in neutralization was estimated to be 40-fold as compared to that which was achieved against the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 variant.

Further, neutralizing antibody responses shortly after infection or vaccination with either the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2, Moderna mRNA-1273, or Johnson & Johnson Ad26.COV2.S vaccines were substantially less potent against the Omicron variant. This reduction in neutralization ranged from 7- to 45-fold across all serum pools.

Samples that were obtained from infected-then-vaccinated individuals presented robust neutralizing potency against the Omicron variant. The significant neutralization of variants in these individuals demonstrates the utility of vaccination, particularly in individuals who were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Characterization of the relative neutralization resistance of Omicron. A-B.

Conclusion

Overall, the data presented in the current study demonstrates an extensive but incomplete loss of neutralization against the Omicron variant by both natural and vaccine-induced antibodies, as well as current therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. These findings demonstrate that in light of the current situation where Omicron is the dominant circulating strain, previously infected individuals who are unvaccinated cannot necessarily be considered immune against this new strain of SARS-CoV-2. However, vaccination of individuals with a history of COVID-19 provides impressive cross-neutralizing antibody responses that can offer some protection against the Omicron variant.

Although the S309 antibody retained some of its neutralization against the Omicron variant, most of the monoclonal antibodies that are currently being used in the clinical setting were unable to neutralize this new strain of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the researchers argue that rapid diversification of current therapeutic monoclonal antibodies is needed in order to account for potency losses against the Omicron variant, as well as future variants of SARS-CoV-2.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • May 9 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Dr. Ramya Dwivedi

Written by

Dr. Ramya Dwivedi

Ramya has a Ph.D. in Biotechnology from the National Chemical Laboratories (CSIR-NCL), in Pune. Her work consisted of functionalizing nanoparticles with different molecules of biological interest, studying the reaction system and establishing useful applications.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dwivedi, Ramya. (2023, May 09). Researchers report loss of antibody potency against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 15, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211223/Researchers-report-loss-of-antibody-potency-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-variant.aspx.

  • MLA

    Dwivedi, Ramya. "Researchers report loss of antibody potency against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant". News-Medical. 15 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211223/Researchers-report-loss-of-antibody-potency-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-variant.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Dwivedi, Ramya. "Researchers report loss of antibody potency against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211223/Researchers-report-loss-of-antibody-potency-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-variant.aspx. (accessed November 15, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Dwivedi, Ramya. 2023. Researchers report loss of antibody potency against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. News-Medical, viewed 15 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211223/Researchers-report-loss-of-antibody-potency-against-SARS-CoV-2-Omicron-variant.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine provides strong protection against MIS-C in children aged 5–17