Study explores relative reproduction of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in South Africa

Recently, a rapidly increasing variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in the Gauteng province of South Africa, named Pangolin B.1.1.529 (Omicron). Omicron, which swiftly replaced the circulating Delta and other variants, harbors as many as thirty-two notable mutations in the spike protein. It was reported that the new variant was identified two months after its emergence – in late November 2021. By the 8th of December, this pathogen spread globally – spanning 50 countries with genome surveillance capacity.

The Omicron spread in South Africa remained steadily low before the new variant replaced the Delta variant. The reason behind the new epidemic can be explained via investigating the transmissibility of the Omicron variant.

Study: Relative Reproduction Number of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) Compared with Delta Variant in South Africa. Image Credit: Fit Ztudio/ShutterstockStudy: Relative Reproduction Number of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) Compared with Delta Variant in South Africa. Image Credit: Fit Ztudio/Shutterstock

A recent study published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine presented a modeling result from an analysis of genome surveillance data in Gauteng province, South Africa, using an existing estimation technique.

The study

Here, genome surveillance data of Gauteng province as registered to Global Initiative on Sharing Avian Influenza Data (GISAID) as of the end of November 2021, was utilized. The study assumed that the effective reproduction number of the Omicron variant – Romicron(t), could be deduced by multiplying a constant factor k to that of Delta variant – Rdelta(t). Thus, a relationship Romicron(t) = kRdelta(t). Multinomial distribution was employed for maximum likelihood estimation of unknown parameters. Predicted and observed fractions of Omicron, Delta and other variants were compared – from September until November 2021.

The present study was primarily funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, among others.

Findings

The results showed that Romicron(t) was 4.2 times greater than that of the Delta variant, while the effective reproduction number of other variants was estimated as 1.3 times greater. On estimating the relative exponential growth rate from October-November 2021, the Omicron variant elicited 3.3 times higher transmissibility than the Delta variant.

Transmission advantages of Omicron

Supposing ω was the fraction immune at the beginning of the ongoing epidemic in South Africa and €delta(t) was the time-dependent relative risk reduction due to acquired immunity against the Delta variant. Therefore, Rdelta(t) = (1 − €delta(t)ω)R0,delta, where R0,delta is the basic reproduction number of the Delta variant—which may be on the order of five or six during the winter season.

A similar equation applies to the Omicron variant. Then, the immune protection against the Omicron variant – €omicron, induced by acquired immunity, in the current scenario, is estimated as €omicron = 1/ω {1 − k(1 − €delta(t)ω) R0,delta/R0,omicron}.

The €omicron is likely to be very small – about 10–20%. It is possible that the transmission advantage of Omicron over Delta could have been gained byOmicron’s escape mechanism from existing immunity in the population.

Data suggests a reduced the neutralization potential against the Omicron variant among previously vaccinated individuals, along with an increased frequency of reinfections. However, a four-fold higher infection rate entirely due to increased transmissibility is unlikely.

Moreover, Omicron has a substantial transmission potential to penetrate the existing herd immunity achieved through mass vaccination in many countries. Yet, several questions remain unanswered:

  • The effectiveness of vaccines against the Omicron variant – particularly in countries that used different types of vaccine, for instance, messenger RNA vaccine.
  • The clinical severity of infection across age groups and among different populations with underlying health conditions.
Journal reference:
Nidhi Saha

Written by

Nidhi Saha

I am a medical content writer and editor. My interests lie in public health awareness and medical communication. I have worked as a clinical dentist and as a consultant research writer in an Indian medical publishing house. It is my constant endeavor is to update knowledge on newer treatment modalities relating to various medical fields. I have also aided in proofreading and publication of manuscripts in accredited medical journals. I like to sketch, read and listen to music in my leisure time.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Saha, Nidhi. (2021, December 30). Study explores relative reproduction of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in South Africa. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 22, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211230/Study-explores-relative-reproduction-of-the-SARS-CoV-2-omicron-variant-in-South-Africa.aspx.

  • MLA

    Saha, Nidhi. "Study explores relative reproduction of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in South Africa". News-Medical. 22 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211230/Study-explores-relative-reproduction-of-the-SARS-CoV-2-omicron-variant-in-South-Africa.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Saha, Nidhi. "Study explores relative reproduction of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in South Africa". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211230/Study-explores-relative-reproduction-of-the-SARS-CoV-2-omicron-variant-in-South-Africa.aspx. (accessed November 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Saha, Nidhi. 2021. Study explores relative reproduction of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in South Africa. News-Medical, viewed 22 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211230/Study-explores-relative-reproduction-of-the-SARS-CoV-2-omicron-variant-in-South-Africa.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Phase 2 study evaluates safety and efficacy of asunercept in COVID-19 patients