Framework for genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro evolution

A recent study posted to the bioRxiv* preprint server investigated the active genetic evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) main protease (Mpro), its emerging mutations, and the existence of antiviral resistance against Mpro inhibitors like paxlovid.

The emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants has necessitated the development of therapeutic approaches against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the potential antiviral resistance emerging prior to, during, and after the introduction of such therapies needs extensive research. 

Study: Genetic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro reveals high sequence and structural conservation prior to the introduction of protease inhibitor Paxlovid. Image Credit NIAIDStudy: Genetic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro reveals high sequence and structural conservation prior to the introduction of protease inhibitor Paxlovid. Image Credit NIAID

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

About the study

In the present study, researchers monitored the genetic changes occurring in SARS-CoV-2 Mpro and the development of potential mutations that could evade the human immune response. They also assessed the efficiency of Mpro as a COVID-19 drug target and provided an understanding of the diversity of Mpro prior to the introduction of paxlovid.

The team investigated the conservation of Mpro proteins across the Coronaviridae family by examining the active sites found on the α-CoVs, β-CoVs, and γ-CoVs structures. The active sites on the amino acid sequences on these CoVs and the differences in structural conformations of multiple Mpro enzymes were assessed by comparing the same to selected Protein Data Bank (PDB) structures. The authors selected 26 amino acids as active site residues.

Amino acid changes in Mpro were monitored using an in-house annotation pipeline that enabled the team to regularly retrieve and annotate the Mpro sequences of different SARS-CoV-2 genomes. The study also investigated the mutation frequency of more than 4.8 million Mpro isolates at the Mpro substrate cleavage sites and the sequence conservation of neighboring amino acid residues along with the open reading frame 1 ab (ORF1ab).

Results

The study results showed that the sequence homology comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro amino acid residues across different CoVs highlighted catalytic site residues and SARS-CoV-2 spike-1 (S1) pocket residues were identical in the Mpro of all the CoV sequences. Furthermore, amino acids residues present at S2 and S4 pockets were also more diverse than the residues at S1. Moreover, the residues in S4 showed even more remarkable diversity as compared to the residues in S2. Notably, while S2 and S4 were not entirely conserved across the proteases of different CoVs, these pockets had significantly identical amino acid sequences.

Active site conservation of CoV main proteases.

Active site conservation of CoV main proteases.

A) Sequence alignment of the 26 binding site amino acids. The key amino acids are indicated by color-coded arrows based on their interaction with the inhibitor, nirmatrelvir. B) SARS-CoV-2 Mpro binding pocket of nirmatrelvir. The pocket surface is colored based on the inhibitor’s interaction shown in panel A.

Furthermore, the study findings also showed that SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 shared 100% identity and similarity at the active sites. Overall, the Mpro sequence and structure were highly conserved among the studied CoVs and the nirmatrelvir binding pockets.

Almost 84% of Mpro isolates shared the same amino acid residue sequence as that of the PDB reference isolate, including approximately 14K unique nucleotide alleles and around 4,800 protein variants. Additionally, the non-synonymous mutation rate (substitution/residue/year) was found to be lower for Mpro than for ribonucleic acid (RNA)-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and over 10-times lower for the S protein. Notably, the study observed the first rise in the non-synonymous mutation rate in the S gene between November 2020 and December 2020, which overlapped with the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha and Beta variants of concern (VOCs).

Dynamic change in amino acid mutation rate of Mpro compared to S protein and RdRp.

Dynamic change in amino acid mutation rate of Mpro compared to S protein and RdRp.

A) Average amino acid changes per residue in Mpro, S protein, and RdRp among isolates collected from January 2020 through January 2022. B) Relative distribution of VOC/VOIs based on collection date. The rapid rise in amino acid changes found in S protein and Mpro near the end of 2021 corresponds to the emergence and takeover of Omicron.

The examination of the SARS-CoV-2 genomes showed that the P132H was the most prevalent mutation, detected in more than 98% of the Omicron isolates, while the G15S and K90R mutations were predominant in the SARS-CoV-2 Lambda and Beta isolates, respectively. Moreover, nine key residues, namely histidine-41 (His41), methionine-49 (Met49), glycine-143 (Gly143), and cysteine-145 (Cys145), His163, His164, Met165, glutamic acid-166 (Glu166), and glutamine-189 (Gln189) were identified in the co-crystal structure of the Mpro-nirmatrelvir complex. Among these, His41 and Cys145 were catalytic residues, while the rest directly interacted with nirmatrelvir.

Mpro mutation breakdown at nirmatrelvir contact and catalytic residues.

Mpro mutation breakdown at nirmatrelvir contact and catalytic residues.

A) Mutations identified at residues directly interacting with nirmatrelvir and/or substrate peptide. B) Three-dimensional structural model of Mpro (PDB ID 7RFS.pdb), with residues from panel A highlighted in “stick” representation and shown in individual colors. Protein backbone is shown in ribbon representation.

A total of 445 unique amino acid alterations were identified within the five residues of the Mpro substrate cleavage sites. Notably, while the P1 Gln residue was the most conserved amino acid found on the reference sequence, P2 and P1 positions showed fewer mutations in all the examined isolates. 

Conclusion

The study findings showed that the structural conservation and the genetic stability of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro indicated the lack of any pre-existing resistance to nirmatrelvir. The researchers believed this study presents an established system that allows genetic surveillance using real-world genomic data. The constant emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and their evolution under the various selective pressures will prove critical in future studies against COVID-19.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • May 12 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Bhavana Kunkalikar

Written by

Bhavana Kunkalikar

Bhavana Kunkalikar is a medical writer based in Goa, India. Her academic background is in Pharmaceutical sciences and she holds a Bachelor's degree in Pharmacy. Her educational background allowed her to foster an interest in anatomical and physiological sciences. Her college project work based on ‘The manifestations and causes of sickle cell anemia’ formed the stepping stone to a life-long fascination with human pathophysiology.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Kunkalikar, Bhavana. (2023, May 12). Framework for genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro evolution. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 24, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220405/Framework-for-genomic-surveillance-of-SARS-CoV-2-Mpro-evolution.aspx.

  • MLA

    Kunkalikar, Bhavana. "Framework for genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro evolution". News-Medical. 24 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220405/Framework-for-genomic-surveillance-of-SARS-CoV-2-Mpro-evolution.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Kunkalikar, Bhavana. "Framework for genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro evolution". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220405/Framework-for-genomic-surveillance-of-SARS-CoV-2-Mpro-evolution.aspx. (accessed November 24, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Kunkalikar, Bhavana. 2023. Framework for genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro evolution. News-Medical, viewed 24 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220405/Framework-for-genomic-surveillance-of-SARS-CoV-2-Mpro-evolution.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
SARS-CoV-2 hijacks cholesterol trafficking to fuel infection and evade immune responses