Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that has led to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has caused 400 million infections throughout the world, with 78 million infections in the United States (US) alone. Two million of those infections are reported in staff and residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). They represent around 16% of total deaths in the US.
This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources
Background
LTCFs are considered high-risk environments due to their congregant living setting and the presence of multiple comorbidities. Therefore, LTCFs were kept at the forefront in surveillance testing as well as were the first groups to receive vaccines when they were available. Over 80% of staff and residents were vaccinated as reported till February 2022 in the country.
However, before vaccines and other preventative measures were available, the staff and residents suffered high infection rates, with seroprevalence rates as high as 40%. Therefore, two immunologically distinct groups were available for vaccination, those that were naïve, with no evidence of prior infection (seronegative), and those that were pre-immune due to prior infection (seropositive).
Several studies suggested that the level of binding antibodies was much higher in seropositive individuals than in seronegative ones following the first dose of the vaccine. Similar results were also found post the second dose. However, studies on the polyclonal antibody neutralization of the live SARS-CoV-2 virus did not occur.
A new study published in pre-print server bioRxiv* collected and analyzed sera from the staff at a local long-term care facility (LTCF) from August to December 2020, where an outbreak occurred in September 2020. The study also analyzed the samples collected from the staff following vaccination from February to September 2021 to determine the impact of prior infection on vaccination.
About the study
The study involved staff at a local LTCF from whom blood samples were collected. The blood samples were then allowed to clot, followed by separation of sera. The sera were heat-inactivated at 56°C for 30 minutes and stored at 4°C.
Vero cells were used for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Standard plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) was performed where diluted sera were mixed with the virus, incubated, and added to a Vero cell monolayer. This was again followed by incubation. After that, binding assays were performed, followed by surveillance qPCR testing.
Study findings
The results indicated that individuals who were previously infected had higher levels of neutralizing antibodies following administration of the first dose of vaccine than seronegative individuals. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody binding levels reached a maximum level at 70 days post-vaccination for all individuals. The difference in RBD levels for seropositive and seronegative individuals was not as significant as the neutralizing antibodies level.
Individuals with detectable nucleoprotein (NP) binding antibodies were suggested to have a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection since there was no nucleoprotein component in the vaccine. Additionally, the neutralizing and RBD binding antibody levels were significantly increased in seronegative individuals following the second dose of the vaccine. However, the neutralizing, RBD binding, and NP binding antibody levels remained unchanged for pre-vaccination seropositive individuals.
The results also reported a strong relationship between the neutralizing titer and RBD binding antibody in post-vaccination sera samples independent of the immune status. However, the relationship was poorly correlated in the case of nucleoprotein antibodies. Furthermore, only one individual in the cohort was reported to experience a breakthrough infection post-vaccination.
Conclusion
Therefore, the current study demonstrates that a prior infection significantly increases SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses following vaccination. The levels of both neutralizing and RBD binding antibody levels were found to increase following the first dose of the vaccine. However, these levels remained almost unchanged following the second dose. Breakthrough infection was reported only in one individual who had received both vaccine doses. This suggests the importance of booster doses to further protect against severe disease. Variant-specific booster doses are now an important measure for maintaining long-term immunity against SARS-CoV-2.
This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources
Journal references:
- Preliminary scientific report.
Gallichotte, E. et al. (2022) "Impact of prior infection on SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in vaccinated long-term care facility staff". bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2022.04.04.487083. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.04.487083v1
- Peer reviewed and published scientific report.
Gallichotte, Emily N., Mary Nehring, Sophia Stromberg, Michael C. Young, Ashley Snell, Josh Daniels, Kristy L. Pabilonia, Sue VandeWoude, Nicole Ehrhart, and Gregory D. Ebel. 2022. “Impact of Prior Infection on SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses in Vaccinated Long-Term Care Facility Staff.” Edited by Matthew B. Frieman. MSphere 7 (4). https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00169-22. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msphere.00169-22.
Article Revisions
- May 12 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.