Superior protection with 'mix-and-match' COVID-19 booster strategy

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was caused by the sudden global outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since SARS-CoV-2 emerged at the end of 2019, scientists have worked relentlessly to develop several vaccines to reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and protect individuals from severe COVID-19.

Recently, a rapid decline in the level of antibodies elicited by vaccination with messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines has been observed. In a new Jama Network Open study, researchers discuss the durability and immunogenicity of homologous and heterologous booster regimens with the Johnson & Johnson Ad26.COV2.S and Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccines.

Study: Durability of Heterologous and Homologous COVID-19 Vaccine Boosts. Image Credit: PhotobyTawat / Shutterstock.com

Study: Durability of Heterologous and Homologous COVID-19 Vaccine Boosts. Image Credit: PhotobyTawat / Shutterstock.com

Background

Outstanding short-term immunogenicity and protective efficacy have been associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. However, between three to six months after primary vaccination, neutralizing antibody (nAb) responses decline. A similar decline in nAb levels has been observed after the third and fourth mRNA booster doses that were offered to provide protection against the highly mutated Omicron variant.

As compared to mRNA vaccines, lower initial nAb titers are induced by the Johnson & Johnson adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. However, these responses were maintained for at least eight months.

Previous research has shown that CD8+ T-cell responses may contribute to protection against severe disease and are more durable than serum nAb titers. T-cell responses are significantly crossreactive against the Omicron variant, despite the ability of this variant to evade nAbs elicited by vaccination.

Optimal boosting strategies are the subject of active research, the results of which will be instrumental for long-term pandemic control.

About the study

The primary aim of this study was to analyze the durability and immunogenicity of homologous and heterologous vaccine booster strategies.

This study was conducted at a clinical site in Boston, Massachusetts. Taken together, 68 study participants who received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine and were boosted with either the BNT162b2 or Ad26.COV2.S vaccines at least six months after completing their primary vaccination were included in the current study.

Individuals with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as receipt of other COVID-19 vaccines or immunosuppressive medications, were excluded from the study. Furthermore, individuals were not allowed to participate if they had a confirmed breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection or positive nucleocapsid serology as detected by an electrochemiluminescence assay (ECLA).

Study participants were enrolled between August 12, 2021, and October 25, 2021, with an additional four months of follow-up after the study period ended. Data analysis to evaluate humoral and cellular immune responses was performed between November 2021 and February 2022.

Study findings

Homologous boosting generated a rapid increase of Omicron nAbs, which peaked in the second week and subsequently declined by almost seven-fold by the 16th week. Comparatively, heterologous-boosted nAbs peaked in the fourth week and declined by about two-fold by the 16th week. These results are consistent with other findings describing the durability of immune responses following initial mRNA vaccination with a booster dose of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine.

The heterologous booster dose was also associated with higher Omicron-specific CD8+ T-cell responses. This response remains highly cross-reactive against the Omicron variant, despite the ability of this variant to evade nAbs elicited by vaccination.

In South Africa, BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines provided 70% and 85% efficacy, respectively, against hospitalization with the Omicron variant in the absence of nAbs. This observation suggests the crucial role of other immune responses in rendering protection against severe COVID-19.

Limitations

A key limitation of the current study relates to its small size at a single site in Boston. Additionally, there was a lack of randomization, and females were over-represented.

Thus, future research using larger and more representative sample sizes is needed. Furthermore, follow-up times beyond 16 weeks are required to assess long-term durability.

Conclusions

Taken together, heterologous and homologous booster vaccination generated Omicron-specific antibody and T-cell responses in mRNA-vaccinated individuals. Notably, heterologous vaccination elicited higher nAb and CD8+ T-cell responses. These observations suggest the benefits of heterologous vaccine regimens.

Journal reference:
Dr. Priyom Bose

Written by

Dr. Priyom Bose

Priyom holds a Ph.D. in Plant Biology and Biotechnology from the University of Madras, India. She is an active researcher and an experienced science writer. Priyom has also co-authored several original research articles that have been published in reputed peer-reviewed journals. She is also an avid reader and an amateur photographer.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Bose, Priyom. (2022, August 14). Superior protection with 'mix-and-match' COVID-19 booster strategy. News-Medical. Retrieved on December 21, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220814/Superior-protection-with-mix-and-match-COVID-19-booster-strategy.aspx.

  • MLA

    Bose, Priyom. "Superior protection with 'mix-and-match' COVID-19 booster strategy". News-Medical. 21 December 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220814/Superior-protection-with-mix-and-match-COVID-19-booster-strategy.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Bose, Priyom. "Superior protection with 'mix-and-match' COVID-19 booster strategy". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220814/Superior-protection-with-mix-and-match-COVID-19-booster-strategy.aspx. (accessed December 21, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Bose, Priyom. 2022. Superior protection with 'mix-and-match' COVID-19 booster strategy. News-Medical, viewed 21 December 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220814/Superior-protection-with-mix-and-match-COVID-19-booster-strategy.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Scientists discover key protein that helps cancer cells evade CAR T cell therapy