Novel mechanism identified that SARS-CoV-2 uses to suppress antiviral responses to make the cell more permissive to infection

In a recent study published in PLoS Pathogens, researchers assessed the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) open-reading frame (ORF)-6 on innate immune signaling.

Study: SARS-CoV-2 ORF6 disrupts innate immune signalling by inhibiting cellular mRNA export. Image Credit: Willyam Bradberry/Shutterstock
Study: SARS-CoV-2 ORF6 disrupts innate immune signalling by inhibiting cellular mRNA export. Image Credit: Willyam Bradberry/Shutterstock

Background

A betacoronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 is the cause of the deadly viral illness coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Understanding the molecular biology of the virus and how it interacts with the host cell is urgently needed due to its significant impact on human health. Nine putative accessory proteins SARS-CoV-2 encodes are considered unnecessary for in vitro replication and likely play a part in modifying the host cell milieu to promote viral replication.

About the study

In the present study, researchers demonstrated that the SARS-CoV-2 ORF6 accessory protein interacted with cellular ribonucleic acid export 1 (Rae1) by preventing messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) export.

The team first created a panel of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 virus-like particles (VLPs) that encoded each ORF to transduce a variety of different cell lines and induce the expression of each accessory protein separately to examine the function of SARS-CoV-2 accessory proteins. VLPs were created when HEK293T cells were cotransfected with the HIV-1 Gag-Pol, VSV-G, and a pLVX-StrepII-ORF vector containing ORF3a, ORF3d, ORF6, ORF7a, ORF7b, ORF8, ORF9b, ORF9c, or ORF10 genes.

All VLPs had at least 104 infectious units/ml when their titers were assessed after 72 hours, with the exception of the ORF6 that encodes for a VLP having undetectable infectious units. Transfected HEK293T cell lysates were examined by immunoblotting the HIV-1 structural polyprotein, Gag, to identify whether this was caused by a drop in infectivity or a reduction in particle formation.

The team then produced green fluorescent protein (GFP)-reporter HIV-1 VLPs while increasing the concentrations of ORF6 or ORF9b as a control to determine whether there was a dose-dependent influence on Gag expression and VLP generation. Immunoblotting was used to examine the HIV-1 Gag and ORF6/ORF9b in transfected HEK293T cell lysates.

The researchers also examined the effect of ORF6 on the expression of MLV Gag and mApple fluorescent protein since they have entirely different protein sequences from HIV-1 Gag to note if ORF6 suppression was only specific to HIV-1 Gag expression. Similar to HIV-1 Gag, MLV Gag expression and VLP generation were suppressed by ORF6 in a dose-dependent manner.

The study also overexpressed Rae1 together with HIV-1 Gag and ORF6 in HEK293T cells to test the hypothesis that ORF6 could inhibit protein expression by interacting with the Rae1-Nup98 complex. To keep the protein levels of ORF6 consistent with the Rael levels, the study employed the original ORF6 expression vector in this instance. Co-immunoprecipitations were conducted to verify ORF6's connection with Rae1 and investigate the relationship with Nup98. Plasmids encoding Strep-tagged GFP or ORF6 with Nup98 and/or HA-Rae1 were co-transfected into HEK293T cells. Cells were lysed after 24 hours, and an anti-Strep antibody was used to immunoprecipitate GFP or ORF6.

Results

All cells, except those transfected with pLVX-StrepII-ORF6, showed evidence of Gag. This indicated that ORF6 expression prevented the generation of VLPs by inhibiting the synthesis of Gag. Only when ORF6 was present in increasing concentrations did gag expression decline in a dose-dependent manner. The team verified that ORF6 produced from this vector significantly reduced viral infectivity and Gag expression. Although immunoblotting demonstrated very low expression of ORF3d, ORF9c, and ORF10, which others have also seen, none of the other ORFs had an impact on the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of mApple. Altogether, our findings imply that ORF6 can block the production of several proteins produced by a vector.

The team also verified that ORF6 produced from this vector significantly reduced viral infectiousness and Gag expression. Additionally, when mApple's MFI was evaluated by flow cytometry after co-transfection of HEK293T cells with plasmids expressing each SARS-CoV-2 ORF in the twin-strep tagged vector, ORF6 significantly decreased the MFI relative to the control. Although immunoblotting demonstrated very low expression of ORF3d, ORF9c, and ORF10, which others have also seen, none of the other ORFs had an impact on the MFI of mApple. When viewed collectively, our findings imply that ORF6 can block the production of several proteins produced by a vector.

Leptomycin B (LMB)-treated cells also had a greater Nucl: Cyto GFP mRNA ratio compared to untreated cells, at 0.93 and 0.35, respectively, even though overall GFP RNA levels were decreased. Cells expressing ORF6 notably had a similar Nucl:Cyto GFP mRNA ratio to the control cells expressing ORF9b, reflecting the only slight reduction in GFP expression, whereas cells expressing ORF6 (LMB) increased the ratio of Nucl:Cyto GFP mRNA and reduced GFP expression. Overall, evidence suggests that ORF6 blocks Rae1-dependent nuclear export of GFP mRNA.

Overall, the study findings revealed a novel mechanism that SARS-CoV-2 uses to manipulate the environment of the host cell to inhibit antiviral defenses, adding to our knowledge of the viral reproduction tactics that led to the unparalleled global health disaster.

Journal reference:
Bhavana Kunkalikar

Written by

Bhavana Kunkalikar

Bhavana Kunkalikar is a medical writer based in Goa, India. Her academic background is in Pharmaceutical sciences and she holds a Bachelor's degree in Pharmacy. Her educational background allowed her to foster an interest in anatomical and physiological sciences. Her college project work based on ‘The manifestations and causes of sickle cell anemia’ formed the stepping stone to a life-long fascination with human pathophysiology.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Kunkalikar, Bhavana. (2022, August 30). Novel mechanism identified that SARS-CoV-2 uses to suppress antiviral responses to make the cell more permissive to infection. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 23, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220830/Novel-mechanism-identified-that-SARS-CoV-2-uses-to-suppress-antiviral-responses-to-make-the-cell-more-permissive-to-infection.aspx.

  • MLA

    Kunkalikar, Bhavana. "Novel mechanism identified that SARS-CoV-2 uses to suppress antiviral responses to make the cell more permissive to infection". News-Medical. 23 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220830/Novel-mechanism-identified-that-SARS-CoV-2-uses-to-suppress-antiviral-responses-to-make-the-cell-more-permissive-to-infection.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Kunkalikar, Bhavana. "Novel mechanism identified that SARS-CoV-2 uses to suppress antiviral responses to make the cell more permissive to infection". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220830/Novel-mechanism-identified-that-SARS-CoV-2-uses-to-suppress-antiviral-responses-to-make-the-cell-more-permissive-to-infection.aspx. (accessed November 23, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Kunkalikar, Bhavana. 2022. Novel mechanism identified that SARS-CoV-2 uses to suppress antiviral responses to make the cell more permissive to infection. News-Medical, viewed 23 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220830/Novel-mechanism-identified-that-SARS-CoV-2-uses-to-suppress-antiviral-responses-to-make-the-cell-more-permissive-to-infection.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Barcoding small extracellular vesicles with new CRISPR-based system