COVID-19 booster doses could significantly reduce the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among young adults

A recent study published in the journal PLOS Medicine examined the effectiveness of booster doses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in protecting vaccinated young adults against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections during the dominant period of the Omicron BA.1 variant.

Study: Booster vaccination protection against SARS-CoV-2 infections in young adults during an Omicron BA.1-predominant period: A retrospective cohort study. Image Credit: Jo Panuwat D / ShutterstockStudy: Booster vaccination protection against SARS-CoV-2 infections in young adults during an Omicron BA.1-predominant period: A retrospective cohort study. Image Credit: Jo Panuwat D / Shutterstock

Background

The emergence of the immune evasive Omicron subvariants and the waning of vaccine-induced immunity have resulted in an increase in breakthrough infections. With the efficacy of the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 and the adenoviral vector vaccine Ad26.COV2.S decreasing against the emergent variants, the United States (U.S.) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended booster doses of any of the three vaccines to be administered six months after primary vaccinations with either of the two mRNA vaccines or two months after primary Ad26.COV2.S vaccinations.

While studies have found that the booster doses are effective in preventing severe outcomes such as hospitalization and death during SARS-CoV-2 infections involving the Omicron subvariants, the efficacy of booster vaccines in preventing mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections is not well understood. Given that the Omicron subvariants' increased transmissibility is linked to the number of mild or asymptomatic cases, it is vital to understand how effective the booster doses are in the overall prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

About the study

In the present study, the researchers conducted a retrospective, cohort-based analysis of deidentified records of Cornell University students obtained from their COVID-19 surveillance database. Participants were recruited from Cornell University's mandatory surveillance testing implemented for faculty, students, and staff as part of their reopening strategy.

The eligible participants had to be students enrolled at the Ithaca campus of the university, with primary vaccinations with any of the World Health Organization (WHO)-approved COVID-19 vaccines. The inclusion criteria also stipulated that the participants must have no positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in the 90 days leading up to the study. Additionally, the vaccination records, including the booster status, also had to be provided.

Since sex and the coding of the primary vaccination completion date were considered confounders in the analysis, students of unspecified sex or with incomplete, preliminary vaccinations or invalid vaccination records were excluded from the study. The study was conducted between December 5th and 31st, 2021, considered the dominant period of the Omicron BA.1 variant.

The measured primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by a positive PCR test. The person-days for each student were calculated, which was the number of days contributed by each participant to the boosted or non-boosted cohort during the study. The person-days were classified as boosted or control based on whether the booster had been administered at least seven days ago, as other studies had reported that booster vaccines become effective seven days after administration.

The probability of a positive PCR-based SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis after receiving a booster dose was calculated using multivariable Poisson regression analysis. The analysis was controlled for covariates such as sex, participation in fraternities or sororities, varsity athletics participation, and primary vaccination type and completion date. Participation in varsity athletics, fraternities, or sororities was included to account for the heterogeneous risk of infection across the study group. The completion date of the primary vaccination accounted for heterogeneity in social behavior, vaccine uptake, and waning immune response.

Results

The results reported that a booster dose decreased the probability of a PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis during the dominance of the Omicron BA.1 variant by 56%, accounting for covariates such as sex, date of completion of primary vaccination, heterogeneous behavior across the study group, and temporal effect.

The observed effectiveness of the booster dose was slightly lower than that reported by other studies against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections among adults during the same time. Students who had received the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine had a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection than students who had received other COVID-19 vaccines, although the difference in risk was not significant, possibly due to the small sample set of students who received the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine.

Students who had completed their primary vaccinations more recently had lower SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence rates, suggesting the waning of vaccine-induced immunity. Additionally, students with increased social contact through participation in varsity athletics and sorority or fraternity events were at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Conclusions

Overall, the results indicated that booster doses of COVID-19 vaccinations effectively reduced the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections by half among the vaccinated young adult population during the dominance of the Omicron BA.1 variant. However, since mild and asymptomatic cases of COVID-19 can still transmit SARS-CoV-2, booster doses may be essential in reducing the incidence of COVID-19.

Journal reference:
Dr. Chinta Sidharthan

Written by

Dr. Chinta Sidharthan

Chinta Sidharthan is a writer based in Bangalore, India. Her academic background is in evolutionary biology and genetics, and she has extensive experience in scientific research, teaching, science writing, and herpetology. Chinta holds a Ph.D. in evolutionary biology from the Indian Institute of Science and is passionate about science education, writing, animals, wildlife, and conservation. For her doctoral research, she explored the origins and diversification of blindsnakes in India, as a part of which she did extensive fieldwork in the jungles of southern India. She has received the Canadian Governor General’s bronze medal and Bangalore University gold medal for academic excellence and published her research in high-impact journals.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Sidharthan, Chinta. (2023, January 12). COVID-19 booster doses could significantly reduce the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among young adults. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 22, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230112/COVID-19-booster-doses-could-significantly-reduce-the-incidence-of-SARS-CoV-2-infection-among-young-adults.aspx.

  • MLA

    Sidharthan, Chinta. "COVID-19 booster doses could significantly reduce the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among young adults". News-Medical. 22 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230112/COVID-19-booster-doses-could-significantly-reduce-the-incidence-of-SARS-CoV-2-infection-among-young-adults.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Sidharthan, Chinta. "COVID-19 booster doses could significantly reduce the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among young adults". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230112/COVID-19-booster-doses-could-significantly-reduce-the-incidence-of-SARS-CoV-2-infection-among-young-adults.aspx. (accessed November 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Sidharthan, Chinta. 2023. COVID-19 booster doses could significantly reduce the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among young adults. News-Medical, viewed 22 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230112/COVID-19-booster-doses-could-significantly-reduce-the-incidence-of-SARS-CoV-2-infection-among-young-adults.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Public trust in COVID-19 vaccine science influences vaccine uptake in the US