Fluctuations in blood pressure from midlife to end-of-life: Correlation with dementia risk

In a recent study published in JAMA Network Open, researchers assess the link between year-to-year blood pressure variability (BPV) at different life stages and the risk of developing dementia in community-dwelling seniors.

Study: Year-by-Year Blood Pressure Variability From Midlife to Death and Lifetime Dementia Risk. Image Credit: pikselstock / Shutterstock.com

Background 

Hypertension during midlife can increase the risk of dementia. Although treating high blood pressure (BP) might reduce this risk, the exact relationship between the two health conditions remains unclear.

As individuals age, hypertension might even lower the risk of dementia. BP variability over time has been attributed to greater risks of heart disease and death. Research on its relation to dementia has produced mixed results, with most studies focusing on variability in later life.

A recent study suggests that fluctuating BP might pose a greater dementia risk than consistent high pressure. This relationship may change with age, gaining significance in older individuals.

Thus, further research is essential to clarify the age-dependent relationship between BP variability and dementia risk.

About the study 

Researchers from the United States-based Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study explored the link between BPV and dementia in participants over 65 years of age from Kaiser Permanente Washington (KPW) in Seattle, Washington. The researchers also examined individuals whose brains were analyzed post-mortem through a donation program.

By accessing the detailed BP and medical histories from KPW archives, the researchers gathered consistent yearly systolic BP (SBP) measurements from age 50 onwards. BPV was then determined for each decade of the participants' lives, excluding those with insufficient data for any given decade.

Dementia detection involved the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument, followed by comprehensive evaluations for those scoring below a set threshold. Dementia diagnoses were based on established medical criteria. Other health-related data, including a history of strokes and heart attacks, were also incorporated.

Using statistical analyses, the relationship between BPV and the onset of dementia was studied. Various models adjusted for factors like average BP, sex, and medical history.

Sensitivity analyses explored potential biases, cardiovascular event implications, and autopsy participant selection influences.

All statistical results with a two-sided P-value below 0.05 were considered significant. The analysis period spanned from March 2020 to September 2023.

Study findings

The present study encompassed a total of 820 participants, including 344 males and 476 females. The average age of the participants at enrolment was 77 years with a standard deviation (SD) of 6.7 years.

During the study, a mean of 28.4 yearly SBP measurements were obtained for each participant over an average period of 31.5 years. This resulted in a total follow-up time of 32.2 years in 27,885 person-years from midlife until death.

A diagnosis of all-cause dementia was evident in 372 participants, which was 45.4% of the study group. The number of individuals who were alive and did not have dementia during different BPV periods varied.

As participants aged, their mean SBP and BPV increased. More specifically, SBP rose from 131 mm Hg at 60 years to 141 mm Hg at 90 years. BPV expanded from 9.31 at age 60 to 11.22 at age 90. The incidence of dementia in their remaining lifetime ranged from 32.1% between 80-89 years of age to 46.2% in the 50-59 age group.

Higher BPV did not correlate with an increased dementia risk at the ages of 60, 70, and 80. However, at the age of 90, a one SD increase in BPV was linked to a 35% elevated risk.

Similarly, for mortality rates, there was no significant association at the ages of 60 and 70. However, at 80 and 90 years of age, the same increment in BPV suggested a 14-16% heightened mortality risk.

When combining dementia and mortality outcomes, the associations were neutral for ages 60 and 70 but indicated 9% and 19% increased risks at ages 80 and 90, respectively.

Further analyses of mean SBP did not show any strong associations; however, varying dementia risks were observed across ages. For example, at age 60, there was a 7% increased risk per SD, which became neutral by age 70 and reduced by 10% and 18% at ages 80 and 90, respectively. SBP did not show any correlation with mortality.

Subgroup and sensitivity tests provided no significant deviations from the main findings. Notably, a certain analysis found that dementia hazard ratios for BPV at age 90 were greater for long-term than short-term intervals.

When evaluating the association between BPV and SBP with elevated dementia risk, the findings were nonlinear and inversely linear, respectively. These relationships appeared to evolve with age.

Journal reference:
Vijay Kumar Malesu

Written by

Vijay Kumar Malesu

Vijay holds a Ph.D. in Biotechnology and possesses a deep passion for microbiology. His academic journey has allowed him to delve deeper into understanding the intricate world of microorganisms. Through his research and studies, he has gained expertise in various aspects of microbiology, which includes microbial genetics, microbial physiology, and microbial ecology. Vijay has six years of scientific research experience at renowned research institutes such as the Indian Council for Agricultural Research and KIIT University. He has worked on diverse projects in microbiology, biopolymers, and drug delivery. His contributions to these areas have provided him with a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter and the ability to tackle complex research challenges.    

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Kumar Malesu, Vijay. (2023, November 02). Fluctuations in blood pressure from midlife to end-of-life: Correlation with dementia risk. News-Medical. Retrieved on December 22, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20231102/Fluctuations-in-blood-pressure-from-midlife-to-end-of-life-Correlation-with-dementia-risk.aspx.

  • MLA

    Kumar Malesu, Vijay. "Fluctuations in blood pressure from midlife to end-of-life: Correlation with dementia risk". News-Medical. 22 December 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20231102/Fluctuations-in-blood-pressure-from-midlife-to-end-of-life-Correlation-with-dementia-risk.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Kumar Malesu, Vijay. "Fluctuations in blood pressure from midlife to end-of-life: Correlation with dementia risk". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20231102/Fluctuations-in-blood-pressure-from-midlife-to-end-of-life-Correlation-with-dementia-risk.aspx. (accessed December 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Kumar Malesu, Vijay. 2023. Fluctuations in blood pressure from midlife to end-of-life: Correlation with dementia risk. News-Medical, viewed 22 December 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20231102/Fluctuations-in-blood-pressure-from-midlife-to-end-of-life-Correlation-with-dementia-risk.aspx.

Comments

  1. Andrew Larwood Andrew Larwood United Kingdom says:

    Hi Vijay, nice paper. But the researchers at KPW are missing a fundamental fact that the brachial systolic BP is not the pressure that is exerted on the brain or other critical organs like the heart and kidneys, it is just the BP in the arm at any particular time and therefore is not the best measurement.  The researchers should be measuring Central Aortic Blood Pressure (cBP). We already know from BP GUIDE study (J. Sharman et al.) that guidance of hypertension management with Central Blood Pressure (measured by an arm cuff such as the Uscom BP+ device https://uscom.com.au/products/bp/overview/) results in a significantly different therapeutic pathway than conventional cuff BP, with less use of medication to achieve BP control and no adverse effects on left ventricular mass, aortic stiffness, or quality of life. The study found that 16% of people don’t need medication if guided by central BP and this can easily explain why simplistic BP thresholds are not that helpful.

    Carmel McEniery in 2008 showed in a study of 10000 patients, 70% of individuals with high-normal brachial pressure had similar central aortic pressures to those with stage 1 hypertension, who should have been treated but were not.

    The conclusion of this latest publication www.thelancet.com/.../fulltext is that for a wide range of blood pressures, the rate of cardiovascular disease and effectiveness of blood pressure drug treatment was mainly determined by predicted risk, with blood pressure thresholds 140/90 mm Hg or 160/100 mm Hg—ubiquitous in most countries—adding little useful information. When medium-term predicted risk is low, there is no urgency to initiate drug treatment, allowing time to attempt non-pharmacological blood pressure reduction.

    Additional work has also shown that there is a very good association between central blood pressure and subclinical cerebrovascular disease in older adults. The study by Matsumoto et al, supports central blood pressure as a more accurate marker of risk for cerebral microvascular disease among the elderly compared with traditional brachial blood pressure assessments. Cerebral microvascular disease correlates with cognitive decline and vascular dementia in patients with high central blood pressures.

    Today you just can't practice good clinical medicine if you're not measuring central blood pressure and pulse wave analysis.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New blood test could help identify patients at risk for cognitive impairment