Of course the fabric weave would be different. In haste the legend is that the shroud which wrapped Jesus was the very fine expensive woven cloth used by Jesus and the 12 at the last supper the night before. Joseph of Arimathea was said to have had this cloth taken from his upper room which he owned to be used in haste as the cloth to wrap Jesus. So the differences in the weave is not proof of anything concerning the Turin fabric. The carbon dating of the Turin shroud remains as the remaining obstacle although the samples taken for the Carbon dating are extremely questionable. Don't make assumptions and affirm the consequence w/o first consulting what might be considered legend which in many cases has basis in fact. And why not. the Body of Christ in the form of the bread he consecrated lay on that cloth as it was a symbol of that shroud, that same shroud that would cover the flesh of Christ. Paaaleeeze don't presume to offer theories when the logical fallacies are obvious. Connect logical dots; not dots that are so far reaching that you will mislead people in a psuedoscientific way and convince the weak minded.