1. Fisman's “study” is deeply flawed: - Assumes static vaccine efficacy
    Hector Lopez Hector Lopez Canada says:
    May 3, 2022 at 2:54 PM

    Fisman's “study” is deeply flawed:
    - Assumes static vaccine efficacy (completely unrealistic, actual efficacy wanes after 2 weeks to zero within 3-6 months)
    - Does not account for natural immunity
    - Critical limitations were not disclosed
    - They literally picked the desired outcome, then engineered a model to attain it.
    - a misleading, oversimplified model w/severe conflict of interest (Pfizer/AZ)

    Sadly, the Federal government uses pseudoscience such as this to extend mandates indefinitely.

    Reply
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
(Logout)
Post

Terms

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

Provide Feedback