Partial gland cryoablation offers long-term success for prostate cancer patients

A five-year study on men that had just the cancerous portion of their prostate glands destroyed shows that the procedure averted cancer recurrence in most patients while preserving urinary and sexual function.

Led by researchers at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, the study tracked patient outcomes after primary partial gland cryoablation (PPGCA), a procedure where only the cancerous part of the prostate gland is treated with extreme cold (cryotherapy) to destroy it. The therapy, concentrated on a small area of the prostate gland (focal therapy), is increasingly used in place of more-traditional treatments: surgical removal or irradiation of the whole gland.

Removing the entire gland represents the most thorough form of prostate cancer prevention, but most men afterward face urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction in the form of erectile dysfunction and the absence of semen. Authors of the current study from NYU Grossman School of Medicine had previously reported that PPGCA avoids incontinence and minimizes sexual dysfunction. Despite the potential of focal therapy, no study had yet tracked the effectiveness of the combination of partial gland ablation with intense follow-up to watch for, and immediately address, any recurrence.

Published recently in the journal Urology, the study showed that 81 out of 91 participants (89 percent) achieved the main study measure of treatment success over five years. Termed freedom-from-failure (FFF), it means that since PPGCA, a patient has not died specifically from prostate cancer, seen his cancer spread outside of the prostate (metastasize), or needed whole-gland therapy.

Of note, 15 of the 91 patients had a second, successful round of focal therapy when cancer recurred after the FFF period ended, while 15 (16.5 percent) needed to undergo whole-gland treatment in the end.

It's worth considering that the need to take out the whole gland was judged to be treatment failure in our study, even though nearly all of these men, before the advent of partial gland removal, would have had the whole-gland procedure. We found that PPGCA can avert the profound consequences that can come with gland removal while still showing excellent results in preventing recurrence."

Herbert Lepor, MD, senior study author, the Martin Spatz chair of the Department of Urology at NYU Langone Health

Careful tracking

Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enabled the team to reliably identify the sites, and aggressiveness, of cancer, which in turn determined the best candidates for focal therapy. Between May 2017 and March 2024, 313 men with MRI-determined, intermediate-risk prostate cancer were found to meet the study inclusion criteria. Of those, 91 could be evaluated for freedom-from-failure over the entire five years because they had no prostate cancer mortality, metastasis, or need for whole-gland treatment during that time.

The reason to study only intermediate-risk patients, said Dr. Lepor, was that this level of disease aggressiveness would otherwise have required whole-gland treatment immediately upon diagnosis.

Dr. Lepor added that the study results, and his experience in having performed more than 5,000 whole-gland removals (radical prostatectomies) in his career, both argue that 80 percent of men with intermediate-risk disease would choose to undergo focal cryotherapy over prostatectomy if they had the choice.

Importantly, the current study was designed with especially intense surveillance of patients over time after PPGCA, which the researchers say was as important as the initial ablation. Specifically, study patients underwent prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) tests—which capture levels of protein known rise in the presence of prostate cancer—every 6 months, and had an MRI or biopsy at 6 to 12, 24, 42, and 60 months.

Keeping close tabs on patients through the study may also explain in part why just 3.3 percent of patients in the study dropped out (were lost to follow-up) over five years. Dr. Lepor's team employs two full-time research coordinators dedicated to ensuring that men return over time after PPGCA for follow-up PSA tests and MRI.

"This study represents the largest comprehensive, prospective study of men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with partial gland cryoablation," said study author James S. Wysock, MD, assistant professor in the Department of Urology. "We ensured rigorous follow-up over five years, with high patient compliance for PSA testing, MRI, and follow-up biopsies, to thoroughly understand outcomes. As our cohort matures, we'll expand our evaluations to include a broader spectrum of patients—particularly those with lower-risk cancer that's not appropriate for active surveillance, but may not require whole-gland treatment."

Along with Dr. Lepor and Dr. Wysock, study authors from the Department of Urology at NYU Langone were Eli Rapoport, Majlinda Tafa, and Rozalba Gogaj. The study was funded by private donors, many of whom had undergone the study procedure.

Source:
Journal reference:

Lepor, H., et al. (2025). Five-year Oncologic Outcomes Following Primary Partial Gland Cryo-ablation Prospective Cohort Study of Men With Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer. Urology. doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.10.039.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Microplastic contamination found in downstream rivers of Latin America