Oct 1 2012
AVEO Oncology (NASDAQ: AVEO) today announced that detailed results from
an exploratory, randomized Phase 2 study evaluating the combination of
ficlatuzumab, the company's HGF inhibitory antibody, and gefitinib
compared to gefitinib monotherapy in previously untreated Asian subjects
with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were presented at the 2012
Congress of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). As
previously reported, the study did not achieve its primary endpoint;
however, the results presented at ESMO suggest that the addition of
ficlatuzumab to gefitinib may be effective in select subsets of patients.
"The insights gleaned from the Phase 2 study, along with new
pharmacodynamic data, show that inhibiting the HGF ligand may be
important in the treatment of cancer," stated Tuan Ha-Ngoc, president
and chief executive officer, AVEO. "We, along with our scientific
advisors and clinical investigators, remain encouraged about
ficlatuzumab and believe the program warrants further evaluation. Our
top priority is the registration and commercialization of tivozanib, and
with that in mind, we will be focusing our efforts on further
ficlatuzumab development through external collaborations, including with
academic institutions and cooperative groups."
"This study has identified potential predictive biomarkers for the use
of ficlatuzumab in patients with advanced NSCLC," said Tony Mok, M.D.,
professor, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of
Hong Kong, and senior investigator of the study. "Based on these
results, ficlatuzumab merits additional clinical investigation."
The primary endpoint of the study was overall response rate (ORR);
secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall
survival (OS) and correlation of biomarkers with clinical activity. In
the intent to treat (ITT) population, the addition of ficlatuzumab to
gefitinib did not result in statistically significant improved ORR or
PFS in Asian treatment-naïve NSCLC patients. The preliminary OS hazard
ratio in the ITT population for ficlatuzumab plus gefitinib versus
gefitinib monotherapy was 0.84 (95% CI 0.52, 1.37). Final OS data will
be presented once they are mature. The combination was well-tolerated,
with no clinically meaningful differences in adverse event rates
observed between the two arms.
The combination demonstrated a trend for improved ORR and PFS in patients with both EGFR-sensitizing mutations and low c-Met biomarker levels (n=19).
Preliminary OS results suggest that the addition of ficlatuzumab to gefitinib may have a favorable impact in the subset of patients with high stromal HGF (N=17 patients, HR=0, p=0.03). Trends for OS benefit in other biomarker subsets continue to be evaluated.
Results from a Phase 1 clinical study evaluating tumor pharmacodynamic
changes post ficlatuzumab treatment were also presented at ESMO. In the
majority of patients treated, 20 mg/kg of ficlatuzumab (the established
Phase 2 dose of ficlatuzumab) resulted in pharmacodynamic modulation in
liver metastasis by inhibiting the HGF/c-Met pathway and downstream
signaling for cell proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis.
Source: AVEO Oncology