A recent study, currently available on medRxiv* preprint server, shows that long-term adaptive immunity to endemic coronaviruses is widespread, but low in magnitude, and that it shares phenotypic features of spike-specific antibodies and T cell memory across all tested coronaviruses.
This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources
Unlike the highly pathogenic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the a causative agent of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, alongside original SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, endemic human coronaviruses circulate widely around the world, but typically cause common cold with rather limited morbidity and mortality.
However, despite the early development of immunity against multiple endemic human coronaviruses, a majority of adults are still susceptible to periodic re-infections – most notably those that are immunocompromised. As the infection is mild or even asymptomatic, partially protective immune memory can be considered.
When COVID-19 pandemic is concerned, defining the degree of serological and cellular immunity needed to protect against reinfection or severe disease remains a fundamental question. It is likely that a mixture of serum antibodies and T/B memory cells provides a long-term protection.
Consequently, the study of coronavirus-specific T and B cell memory can give us a crucial preview into the development of long-lasting, protective SARS-CoV-2 immunity, as the role of cross-reactive immunity, and which cells dominate in the response, is currently unclear.
Hence, to address important knowledge gaps regarding this issue, a research group led by the Dr. Hyon-Xhi Tan from the University of Melbourne, Australia, aimed to assess the prevalence and phenotypic characteristics of spike-specific antibodies against human coronaviruses, as well as memory T and B cell responses in a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 uninfected adults.
Methodological approach
For the purposes of this study, researchers have recruited a cohort of 42 SARS-CoV-2 uninfected adults from 18 to 67 years of age, without any recent cold symptoms or other signs related to COVID-19. In this group of individuals, the researchers have quantified CD4 T-cell and antibody responses to spike antigens.
More specifically, to determine the distribution of CD4 T cell memory responses, they have stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells with recombinant spike glycoprotein antigens and quantified antigen-specific T memory cells by measuring up-regulation of the activation markers CD25 and OX-40 by flow cytometry.
Taking into account the divergent host receptor specificity and potential differences in tissue tropism among human coronaviruses, the researchers have also appraised whether memory or chemokine receptor phenotypes differed among spike-specific CD4 T-cell populations. Tissue samples from human donors were used for this scientific endeavor.
Cellular vs. humoral immunological memory
In a nutshell, this study has revealed that the magnitude of immunity to human coronaviruses is independent of age and characterized by quite robust antibody titers, widespread CD4 T cell memory within both T memory cells and circulating T follicular helper cells, as well as by an enrichment of T cell memory in lung-draining lymph nodes.
SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive T cells have been observed in 48 percent of study participants, and correlated with specific human coronavirus HKU1 memory. Furthermore, human coronavirus-specific T cells exhibited a CCR6+ central memory phenotype in the blood, but were enriched for CXCR3 expression and frequency in human lung draining lymph nodes.
On the other hand, neutralizing antibody activity was relatively low, and memory B cells were only sporadically detected in the circulation or lung-draining lymph nodes. Cellular and humoral immunological memory seems to be independently maintained for human coronaviruses.
A preview of a long-term immunity
Overall, these data clarify the characteristics of long-term immunity to endemic coronaviruses, which have comparable magnitudes and share phenotypic features of spike-specific antibody and T cell memory across all four human coronaviruses," say study authors.
As the modest neutralization activity shows that sterilizing humoral cross-immunity is likely absent, there is an emphasis on additive contributions of multiple arms of adaptive immune system – specifically anti-viral T-cell responses.
These types of insights into the homeostatic maintenance of immunity against human coronaviruses are likely to provide a preview of a long-term specific immunity established either after wide-spread infection or vaccination.
This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources
Journal references:
- Preliminary scientific report.
Tan, H.X. et al. (2021). Adaptive immunity to human coronaviruses is widespread but low in magnitude. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.24.21250074, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.24.21250074v1.
- Peer reviewed and published scientific report.
Tan, Hyon‐Xhi, Wen Shi Lee, Kathleen M Wragg, Christina Nelson, Robyn Esterbauer, Hannah G Kelly, Thakshila Amarasena, et al. 2021. “Adaptive Immunity to Human Coronaviruses Is Widespread but Low in Magnitude.” Clinical & Translational Immunology 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.1002/cti2.1264. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cti2.1264.
Article Revisions
- Apr 4 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.