Study suggests T-cells don't determine survival in severe COVID-19

By Angela Betsaida B. Laguipo, BSNApr 6 2021

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), causes mild to moderate illness in the general population. Some people, however, may experience severe symptoms, which can be potentially fatal.

Severe COVID-19 has been tied to T cell lymphopenia, but no causal effect of T cell deficiency on disease severity has been established.

Researchers at the Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health found that T cell-depleted groups of rhesus macaques developed virus-neutralizing antibody responses and also class-switched to immunoglobulin G (IgG).

In the study, which appeared on the pre-print server medRxiv*, the team found that when the monkeys were reinfected, the T cell-depleted animals showed anamnestic immune responses, the enhanced reaction of the body's immune system to an antigen that is related to an antigen previously encountered.

This is characterized by the rapid induction of high-titer virus-neutralizing antibodies, faster control of viral loads, and decreased symptoms or clinical signs.

Study background

Previous studies suggest that T cells or T lymphocytes play imperative roles in COVID-19. For instance, it has been shown that COVID-19 convalescent patients, or those who recovered from the illness, possess both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells responsive to SARS-CoV-2 antigens.

Also, severe COVID-19 has been linked to lymphopenia, the reduced amount of white blood cells in the blood. During an infection, like COVID-19, white blood cells attack, bind to, and help stimulate the production and secretion of chemicals to fight the virus. There is also the loss of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

However, it is still unclear whether lymphopenia contributes to severe COVID-19 or an effect of the disease.

The study

To provide definitive proof of T cells' importance in recovery from infection and the development of anamnestic responses, the researchers studied adult rhesus macaques depleted of either CD4+, CD8+, or both T cells subsets before infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Like most adult humans, rhesus macaques only become mildly or moderately affected. They do not usually develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a severe complication of COVID-19.

A better understanding of the immunological mechanisms contributing to the development of resistance in these animals can help future vaccine studies. It can help in the development of new vaccines, therapeutics, and prophylactics.

The researchers focused on T cells' role in resolving acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and developing immunological memory. This provides better protection from potential re-infection in the future.

The researchers inoculated the macaques with the Washington isolate of SARS-CoV-2 and rested for six weeks to arrive at the study findings. From there, the team challenged the animals a second time. They conducted two separate experiments, each with three animals per group for a total of six macaques per group.

The team revealed that CD4+ and CD8+ T cells' depletion only slightly prolonged the monkeys' recovery from their first infection. These cells had little or no impact on the recovery from re-infection. This does not mean that T cells have no role in controlling SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, the roles do not appear as necessary, which means their loss can be compensated by other immune cells.

Experimental design and T cell depletions. a. T cell subset-depleting antibodies were administered on days -7, 0 and +4 as indicated by the blue arrows. Infections were done on days 0 and 42 as indicated by red arrows. Blood withdrawals were performed on the days indicated by the black arrows and flow cytometry was used to determine the lymphocyte subset numbers over time. The flow cytometry gating strategies are shown in Supplemental data Fig. 1b. Each symbol represents a single animal throughout. All CD4-depleted animals except CD4- 5 were still greater than 90% depleted of CD4+ T cells at 7dpi. CD4-5 was 78% depleted. CD4+ Th numbers excluded FoxP3+ cells. At 7 days post-re-infection (49 dpi) the animals averaged 81% depleted. All CD8-depleted animals were >99% depleted at 7dpi and remained 78% depleted at 49dpi. The differences between subset numbers at 0 dpi and 7 dpi were calculated by a two-way paired test. ns = not significant and other p values are shown. Numbers of B cells (d, g, j, m) were determined by flow cytometry using CD45 and CD20 as markers. The numbers of B cells in the CD4-depleted group were significantly lower over time than the controls as determined by mixed effects analysis (p=0.0118).

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Further, there is no evidence that T cells play a role in developing the disease in monkeys. The team found that disease severity in monkeys who are T cell replete was similar to the T-cell depleted animals.

The team also showed that old age in humans plays a vital role in vulnerability to severe illness and death from COVID-19. Advanced age is linked to immunosenescence, which makes them easily infected with pathogens. This means that older adults are at a higher risk and are less able than adult monkeys to compensate for immune deficiencies, including SARS-CoV-2-induced lymphopenia.

When it comes to rhesus macaques, older monkeys develop lower antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infections. This means that different results will be obtained using older animals.

"That said, our results from adult macaques with profound depletion of either CD4 +  or CD8+ T cells leads to the conclusion that neither subset played a critical role in their recovery from acute disease or re-infection. On the other hand, anamnestic antibody responses were strongly associated with recovery from a second infection and reduced disease," the team concluded in the study.

The team suggests further studies, particularly among older monkeys, to see if the same results will come out. Furthermore, human studies are also needed.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources