Incidence of venous thromboembolism following COVID-19 vaccination

In a recent study posted to the medRxiv* pre-print server, researchers investigated the association between genetic predisposition to venous thromboembolism (VTE) and increased risk of thrombosis post coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination.

Study: Genetic risk and incident venous thromboembolism in middle-aged and older adults following Covid-19 vaccination. Image Credit: Vitalii Vodolazskyi/Shutterstock
Study: Genetic risk and incident venous thromboembolism in middle-aged and older adults following Covid-19 vaccination. Image Credit: Vitalii Vodolazskyi/Shutterstock

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) involves deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and predominantly affects older individuals. VTE affects nearly 10 million people globally every year and leads to considerable morbidity and mortality. Although studies have shown that COVID-19 vaccination is linked to a higher risk of VTE, it is not clear if a genetic predisposition to VTE plays a role in the increased risk of thrombosis post-vaccination.

About the study

In the current study, the researchers used UK Biobank (UKBB) data containing information related to in-depth genotyping data and associated vaccination and health outcomes to generate a polygenic risk score (PRS). They used 299 genetic variants identified in a previous study on large genome-wide association.

The UK Biobank is a prospective cohort with more than 500,000 individuals from England (89%), Scotland (4%), and Wales (7%) between 2006 and 2010. The age of these individuals at baseline enrolment was in the range of 40 to 69 years. The Biobank data comprised comprehensive information about demographics, lifestyle factors, socioeconomics, medical history, and physical metrics collected using questionnaires and standardized measurements.

The team prospectively evaluated associations between incident VTE and PRS post first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccination. They performed sensitivity analyses stratified based on vaccine type (mRNA or adenovirus vaccine) and used two historical cohorts that were unvaccinated. The hazard ratios (HR) for PRS-VTE associations were estimated using Cox models.

In the vaccinated cohorts, all UKBB participants from England who had received at least one dose of ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines between December 2, 2020, and September 31, 2021, were included. The team followed up the eligible participants from the vaccination date to outcome, death, or the end of the follow-up period at 28 and 90 days, whichever happened first. Participants from Scotland or Wales were not included in this cohort because of the lack of vaccination records at the time of this study.

Results

A total of 359,310 individuals received a single COVID-19 vaccine dose, of which 44.6% or 160,327 were males, and the mean age was 69.05 years on the vaccination date. On 28- and 90-day follow up after first-dose vaccination, 88 and 299 patients developed VTE, respectively, which was equivalent to a 0.88 and 0.92 incidence rate per 100,000 person-days. This association between VTE and PRS slightly decreased after the second dose vaccination in the 28- and 90-days follow-up period.

The results showed that the PRS was significantly associated with an increased risk of VTE. The team found similar associations in the two vaccine dose cohort and the historical unvaccinated cohorts after stratification by vaccine type. Of the 221,875 vaccine recipients whose vaccine-type information was available, 172 83,816 received BNT162b2 and 138,059 received ChAdOx1. Similar PRS-VTE associations were observed across each vaccine dose and follow-up period. HR ranged between 1.24 and 1.63 in the ChAdOx1 cohort and between 1.20 and 1.38 in the BNT162b2 cohort.

Interestingly, the VTE incidence rates in the BNT162b2 cohort were nearly twice as high as the incidence rates in the ChAdOx1 cohort. This was expected because the BNT162b2 vaccine was approved first in the UK and was prioritized among the older, more vulnerable populations.

Conclusions

The study results support several conclusions. First, the data showed that genetic susceptibility to VTE is a risk factor for VTE following COVID-19 vaccination. Second, this genetic susceptibility was independent of conventional risk factors including obesity, old age, and comorbidity, as evidenced by the lack of associations between the baseline characteristics and PRS.

Third, data from the historical comparison arm suggests that clinically significant interactions are unlikely between the genetic background of individuals and COVID-19 vaccination. This has specific implications for hereditary VTE patients with predisposing traits who are vaccine-hesitant due to concerns related to vaccine safety signals. Fourth, using the genetic score, the team found that 5% of the participants had an over two-fold higher VTE risk, which is of great public health relevance as it can inform intervention policies in the vaccinated population.

To summarize, the study findings show that the genetic determinants of developing VTE following COVID-19 vaccination are similar to those found in historical data. This indicates that post-COVID-19 vaccine VTE has a similar etiology as conventional VTE, at the population level. In addition, the observed associations between PRS and VTE were equivalent for mRNA and adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccines.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • May 13 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Pooja Toshniwal Paharia

Written by

Pooja Toshniwal Paharia

Pooja Toshniwal Paharia is an oral and maxillofacial physician and radiologist based in Pune, India. Her academic background is in Oral Medicine and Radiology. She has extensive experience in research and evidence-based clinical-radiological diagnosis and management of oral lesions and conditions and associated maxillofacial disorders.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. (2023, May 13). Incidence of venous thromboembolism following COVID-19 vaccination. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 22, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220422/Incidence-of-venous-thromboembolism-following-COVID-19-vaccination.aspx.

  • MLA

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. "Incidence of venous thromboembolism following COVID-19 vaccination". News-Medical. 22 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220422/Incidence-of-venous-thromboembolism-following-COVID-19-vaccination.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. "Incidence of venous thromboembolism following COVID-19 vaccination". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220422/Incidence-of-venous-thromboembolism-following-COVID-19-vaccination.aspx. (accessed November 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. 2023. Incidence of venous thromboembolism following COVID-19 vaccination. News-Medical, viewed 22 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220422/Incidence-of-venous-thromboembolism-following-COVID-19-vaccination.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Public trust in COVID-19 vaccine science influences vaccine uptake in the US