Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 leads to less severe disease in mouse models

Georgia State University researchers have found that the Alpha, Beta and Delta variants of SARS-CoV-2 were substantially more fatal in mouse models than the original strain of the virus that causes COVID-19. However, they also found that the Omicron variant, despite having more mutations, led to less severe disease with half as many deaths and longer survival time.

The findings, published in a study in the journal Viruses, offer new information on how the COVID-19 virus changes over time, and how those changes are leading to different kinds of infections.

Given the speed that variants have emerged over the course of the pandemic, and may continue to emerge, we always want to predict how these variants will behave. We want to know if the next variants will become more lethal than the one before, or weaker, or if it's a random process."

Mukesh Kumar, assistant professor of biology and the paper's lead researcher

In the study, researchers looked at how variants acted in mouse models, examining the effects of the original strain compared to Alpha, Beta, Delta and Omicron variants.

They found that infection with the Alpha, Beta and Delta strains led to higher virus levels in lungs and brains, significant loss of body weight, more inflammation and a 100 percent mortality rate among study subjects.

The Omicron variant was much milder with lower virus levels, less lung inflammation, lower rates of weight loss and a 50 percent mortality rate. This was despite the Omicron variant having more mutations that allow it to bind with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, also known as the ACE2 "receptor," which is a protein the virus binds with so it can infect cells.

"In mice, Omicron was significantly less efficient than the other variants we tested, despite carrying the highest number of mutations," said Kumar. "That tracks along with epidemiological data that suggests that the Omicron virus causes less severe pathology in humans than previous ancestral strains."

Most studies done in mouse models have been with the original virus strain first identified in Wuhan, China, which has been helpful but not informative in our current variant reality, Kumar said. These insights into the pathogenesis of the earlier and currently circulating variants help in understanding the pathogenesis of emerging COVID-19 variants.

The other authors of the study are biology Ph.D. students Janhavi Prasad Natekar, Heather Pathak, Shannon Stone, Pratima Kumari, Shaligram Sharma and Tabassum Tasnim Auroni; and post-doctoral fellows Komal Arora and Hussin Alwan Rothan, all of Georgia State.

Source:
Journal reference:

Natekar, J.P., et al. (2022) Differential Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern in Human ACE2-Expressing Mice. Viruses. doi.org/10.3390/v14061139.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Could vitamin D help COVID-19 patients? Meta-analysis highlights potential ICU reduction