Hospital surfaces harbor pathogens despite cleaning, study finds

A new study published today in the American Journal of Infection Control (AJIC) reports microbial contamination -; including pathogenic and potentially pathogenic bacteria -; on high-touch hospital surfaces despite compliance with recommended disinfection protocols. The findings shed light on the persistent challenge of reducing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and indicate that innovative strategies may be needed for more effective disinfection of these surfaces.

The risk of microbial contamination on hospital surfaces is a well-known factor in the spread of HAIs, and it has led to carefully established disinfection procedures to keep patients and healthcare workers safe. But as this new study demonstrates, current best practices in routine hospital disinfection may not be sufficient to prevent the spread of pathogens, particularly for surfaces that are frequently touched by many different people.

The study was conducted at the Central Texas Veterans Healthcare System, where researchers collected samples from 400 surfaces between June and July of 2022. They focused on high-touch surfaces such as simulation manikins used for resuscitation practice, workstations on wheels, breakroom tables, bed rails, and computer keyboards at nurse's stations. All of these surfaces were found to harbor bacteria, and manikins and bed rails also had the most diverse types of bacteria.

A total of 60 different kinds of bacteria were identified across all samples, including 18 well-known human pathogens and a number of bacteria that can be pathogenic to humans under certain circumstances. The most common types of known pathogenic bacteria included Enterococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella aerogenes, among others. Some of the potentially pathogenic types of bacteria have been associated with central-line associated bloodstream infections, meningitis, and endocarditis. About half of the bacteria identified through these samples were also found in clinical samples collected from patients during 2022.

It is a continuing frustration to healthcare professionals that HAIs persist despite rigorous attention to disinfection practices. Our study clearly shows the bioburden associated with high-touch hospital surfaces -; including simulation manikins, which are not typically regarded as a risk because patients rarely touch them -; and indicates that we must do better in protecting the health of our patients and our hospital employees."

Piyali Chatterjee, PhD, Research Scientist at Central Texas Veterans Healthcare System and senior author of this paper

"This study underscores the critical value of infection prevention and control efforts in our healthcare systems," said Tania Bubb, PhD, RN, CIC, FAPIC, 2024 APIC president. "By understanding the gaps in our current disinfection protocols, we can focus on developing more effective protocols and education strategies to prevent the spread of dangerous organisms and better protect patients and healthcare workers from HAIs."

Source:
Journal reference:

Jinadatha, C., et al. (2024) Understanding the significance of microbiota recovered from healthcare surfaces. American Journal of Infection Control. doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2023.11.006.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
He went in for a colonoscopy. The hospital charged $19,000 for two.