Congress should 'resolve' issues preventing consideration of PEPFAR reauthorization legislation, editorial says

Although it is a "bit risky to herald progress during a global pandemic when infections of a disease such as AIDS still seem to multiply by the millions," the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief gives the U.S. a "record that is worth celebrating, if only to show others around the world what's possible," a Wilmington News Journal editorial says.

PEPFAR has provided "millions of people hope for better and longer lives," the editorial says, adding that "[u]nfortunately, the PEPFAR [reauthorization] legislation hasn't made it to the Senate floor in two months."

A group of seven Republicans has "broken away" from the party's "obvious support in both chambers to sign a 'hold letter' to stop action on the reauthorization," the editorial says, adding, "These conservatives want stronger assurances that the reauthorization reflects their strong animus to abortion and support for abstinence counseling when it comes to family planning."

Leadership in "both chambers needs to own up to the original bipartisanship" demonstrated with the creation of PEPFAR and "resolve what is a manageable tiff with the sulking seven," the editorial says. Allowing the reauthorization bill to "remain on the back burner any longer dooms it to become a victim of an attention-deficit, election-minded Congress come fall," according to the editorial, which concludes that without PEPFAR reauthorization, HIV/AIDS cases will continue to increase and more "lives will be lost. All of which is the antithesis of the lifesaving, preventive message our government should be championing" (Wilmington News Journal, 5/19).


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Online reviews of health care facilities drop significantly after COVID-19 pandemic