Could GRP78 be a therapeutic target against COVID-19?

As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to take an enormous toll on public health and the economy in many parts of the world, the search for effective and safe new treatments remains an urgent one.

A new study by a team of researchers at the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, USA, reports a potentially important therapeutic target in the form of a molecule called GRP78 that promotes the entry and protein production by many viruses. The team's paper has been published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry.

The rollout of vaccines offers some hope that viral spread may be contained within a few years, albeit this hope is threatened by the emergence of partially resistant new variants of concern (VOCs) such as the South African, Brazil or Indian variants. The successful identification of treatment approaches could help deal with these resistant variants or treat those who cannot get the vaccine for various reasons.

SARS-CoV-2 entry

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mediates host cell attachment through the spike antigen, via the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor on the host cell.

Following receptor engagement, the spike protein causes virus-host cell membrane fusion to facilitate viral entry, and the further fusion of adjacent cells to form a syncytium.

Besides the ACE2 molecule, other host factors act as cofactors to establish productive infection. One such site is the GRP78 (78 kilo-Dalton glucose-regulated protein) which appears to interact with the viral receptor-binding domain (RBD).

This may indicate that it is an alternative receptor for viral entry. Computational modeling showed that this receptor promotes GRP78-mediated recognition by the UK VOC, B.1.1.7, and the South African variant, B.1.351.

GRP78

This protein is a heat shock protein found abundantly within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). GRP78 is a major ER chaperone, enabling proper synthesis and maturation of viral proteins. For instance, it ensures correct protein folding, which is essential for protein function. It regulates the protein unfolding required for cellular responses to ER-targeting stresses.

This protein is expressed on airway cells and many other tissues and is overexpressed in SARS-CoV-2 infection. During viral infections, as with Zika, Ebola, and now SARS-CoV-2, it migrates to the surface of the cell (cell surface GRP78, csGRP) and promotes viral entry.

Again, GRP78 promotes ACE2 trafficking to the cell surface (csACE2), and enhances binding with the viral spike.  

And finally, the virus-induced ER stress conditions increase surface GRP78 expression, further enhancing viral entry. Thus, viral infection sets up a positive feedback cycle and hijacks this molecular chaperone to act as a co-receptor for multiple signaling molecules and also for viral entry.

Multiple roles of GRP78 in SARS-CoV-2 infection

The current study provided experimental proof to support earlier computational modeling predictions, that in SARS-CoV-2 infection, the viral spike RBD complexes with both GRP78 and ACE2. This depends on the presence of the spike binding domain (SBD) of GRP78, as shown by a previous modeling study.

GRP78 also binds directly to ACE2, through both the SBD and the ATP binding domain. The GRP78 thus stabilizes spike-ACE2 binding besides acting as a co-receptor. This enhances efficient viral entry.

GRP78 interactions with SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and ACE2 by confocal Immunofluorescence and Proximity ligation assay. (A) Confocal immunofluorescence (IF) images of VeroE6-ACE2 cells expressing HA-Spike probed with anti-HA (red) and anti-GRP78 (green) antibodies. The top and bottom row represent permeabilized (Perm) and non-permeabilized (non-Perm) cells respectively. The boxed areas are enlarged on the right. Arrows indicate co-staining. (Scale bars, 20 μm). (B) Schematic diagram of the proximity ligation assay (PLA). (C) VeroE6-ACE2 cells transfected with vector expressing HA-Spike or empty vector (pcDNA3) as indicated were subjected to PLA using antibodies against HA and GRP78. DAPI (blue) represents nuclei staining. Yellow indicates colocalization. (Scale bars, 10 μm). (D) Similar to A except for IF staining for ACE2 (red) and GRP78 (green). (Scale bars, 20 μm top row, 5 μm bottom row). (E) Similar to C except VeroE6-ACE2 cells were subjected to PLA using anti-ACE2 and anti-GRP78 antibodies. (Scale bars, 10 μm). (F) PLA negative control groups. Top row: anti-GRP78 + Rabbit IgG isotype (GRP78/IgG); middle row: anti-ACE2 + Mouse IgG isotype (ACE2/IgG) and bottom row: Mouse IgG + Rabbit IgG (IgG/IgG) in permeabilized VeroE6-ACE2 cells. (Scale bar 40 μm).
GRP78 interactions with SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and ACE2 by confocal Immunofluorescence and Proximity ligation assay. (A) Confocal immunofluorescence (IF) images of VeroE6-ACE2 cells expressing HA-Spike probed with anti-HA (red) and anti-GRP78 (green) antibodies. The top and bottom row represent permeabilized (Perm) and non-permeabilized (non-Perm) cells respectively. The boxed areas are enlarged on the right. Arrows indicate co-staining. (Scale bars, 20 μm). (B) Schematic diagram of the proximity ligation assay (PLA). (C) VeroE6-ACE2 cells transfected with vector expressing HA-Spike or empty vector (pcDNA3) as indicated were subjected to PLA using antibodies against HA and GRP78. DAPI (blue) represents nuclei staining. Yellow indicates colocalization. (Scale bars, 10 μm). (D) Similar to A except for IF staining for ACE2 (red) and GRP78 (green). (Scale bars, 20 μm top row, 5 μm bottom row). (E) Similar to C except VeroE6-ACE2 cells were subjected to PLA using anti-ACE2 and anti-GRP78 antibodies. (Scale bars, 10 μm). (F) PLA negative control groups. Top row: anti-GRP78 + Rabbit IgG isotype (GRP78/IgG); middle row: anti-ACE2 + Mouse IgG isotype (ACE2/IgG) and bottom row: Mouse IgG + Rabbit IgG (IgG/IgG) in permeabilized VeroE6-ACE2 cells. (Scale bar 40 μm).

The finding that GRP78 is found in the vicinity of ACE2 both in the perinuclear region where the ER is typically found, and on the cell surface, confirms its role as a co-receptor for both the viral spike protein and human ACE2.

When GRP78 expression was blocked by knocking out the corresponding gene, csACE2 and csGRP78 levels were markedly lower. The cells also showed evidence of protein unfolding. Under ER stress conditions, however, normal cells showed higher GRP78 and csGRP78 levels, but no increase in ACE2 levels.

The researchers also found that a GRP78-targeting monoclonal antibody (humanized MAb159, hMAb159) could be used in lung epithelial cells, to deplete GRP78 and csACE2 from the cell surface. Moreover, the number of cells with csACE2 also decreased.

Cells pre-treated with hMAb159 showed specific and significant reductions in the entry of SARS-CoV-2-spike-expressing pseudoviruses.

Moreover, cells incubated with hMAb159 before introducing live SARS-CoV-2 virus developed far fewer plaques compared to those cells pre-incubated with human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibody, as would be expected if it reduced csACE2 expression.

What are the implications?

Our work provides the first experimental evidence that GRP78 is a direct binding partner of SARS-2-S.” These findings validate earlier computational modeling findings, indicating that not only is GRP78 a promoter of SARS-CoV-2-spike-ACE2 binding, but it also facilitates csACE2 expression.

This molecule is, therefore, a cofactor for SARS-CoV-2 entry, and a potential target for COVID-19 treatment.

The specific GRP78 antibody hMAb159 has been tested for safety in preclinical models and is on the brink of development as a drug. It could be used not only by itself but in combination with other therapies to combat this illness.

Moreover, its overexpression in stressed cells may partly, at least, underlie the increased severity of COVID-19 in patients with chronic illness. While normal cells require GRP78 for their function, infected cells typically have higher amounts.

In this situation, the use of hMAb159 and other drugs that block the activity of ER chaperones like GRP78, which are necessary for viral protein synthesis, could form multiple effective approaches to SARS-CoV-2 inhibition. And not just this virus, but new strains that may emerge, could be targeted.

Thus, instead of targeting individual viruses which are prone to mutations, targeting their critical auxiliary host chaperones such as GRP78 could have a broad spectrum anti-viral effect beyond SARS-CoV-2 with wide clinical implications.”

Journal reference:
Dr. Liji Thomas

Written by

Dr. Liji Thomas

Dr. Liji Thomas is an OB-GYN, who graduated from the Government Medical College, University of Calicut, Kerala, in 2001. Liji practiced as a full-time consultant in obstetrics/gynecology in a private hospital for a few years following her graduation. She has counseled hundreds of patients facing issues from pregnancy-related problems and infertility, and has been in charge of over 2,000 deliveries, striving always to achieve a normal delivery rather than operative.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Thomas, Liji. (2021, May 26). Could GRP78 be a therapeutic target against COVID-19?. News-Medical. Retrieved on December 22, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210526/Could-GRP78-be-a-therapeutic-target-against-COVID-19.aspx.

  • MLA

    Thomas, Liji. "Could GRP78 be a therapeutic target against COVID-19?". News-Medical. 22 December 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210526/Could-GRP78-be-a-therapeutic-target-against-COVID-19.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Thomas, Liji. "Could GRP78 be a therapeutic target against COVID-19?". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210526/Could-GRP78-be-a-therapeutic-target-against-COVID-19.aspx. (accessed December 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Thomas, Liji. 2021. Could GRP78 be a therapeutic target against COVID-19?. News-Medical, viewed 22 December 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210526/Could-GRP78-be-a-therapeutic-target-against-COVID-19.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Breastfeeding after COVID-19 vaccination is safe, with minimal changes to milk composition