Microplastics: How safe are factory workers from invisible threats?

In a recent study published in the journal Science of the Total Environment, researchers examine exposure to microplastics (MPs) in plastic factory personnel.

Study: Environmental Impacts of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: A Current Overview. Image Credit: Larina Marina / Shutterstock.com

The impact of MPs on the environment

In the early 1950s, only about a few tons of plastic products were manufactured each year. Over the past several decades, the manufacturing of plastics has increased at an astronomical level to produce about 400 million tons of plastic each year.

Various environmental factors including abrasion, photooxidation, and other biotic degradation pathways cause these plastic materials to degrade into MPs and nanoplastics (MNPs). Microplastics (MPs), which are tiny particles of plastic that are five millimeters (mm) or smaller in diameter, often contaminate oceans, soil, and air. Surface wind circulation and surface water mixing contribute to the dispersion of MPs in the environment.

The minute size of MPs and MNPs increase the likelihood of their ingestion by numerous species, including humans. MPs have the potential to disrupt cellular membranes and cause oxidative stress; however, these particles have also been shown to act as pollutant transport media for other toxic compounds such as the industrial insecticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and the common fungicide hexachlorobenzene.

The ubiquitous nature of MPs and their potential to cause harm to a wide range of organisms illustrates the importance of identifying sources of exposure to MPs to understand their associated risks.

About the study

In the present study, researchers evaluate occupational exposure to MPs among employees in a plastic factory in Iran. Twenty workers from the jumbo bag sewing section of the factory were recruited. Individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and those taking hourly leaves were excluded.

Participants were instructed to clean their face, mouth, hair, and hands with filtered water before and after leaving the workplace. These samples were prepared for MP extraction and filtration.

Filters were dried and transferred to Petri dishes for examining their physical and chemical properties. MPs were observed under a microscope, enumerated, and classified based on their shape, size, and color.

Polymer composition was identified using micro-Raman spectroscopy. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test was used to assess data normality. The Wilcoxon test compared the number of MPs between dependent samples, whereas the Mann-Whitney U test compared differences between independent samples.

Study findings

Of the 20 participants, one female worker was excluded, leaving 10 male and nine female participants for analysis. When the number of MPs on participants’ faces was assessed before and after work, significant differences between females who used sunscreens and males with mustaches and beards were observed.

Additionally, significant differences in the number of MPs were evident before and after shifts in the hair and hand samples of females who used scarves and gloves. The number of MPs in all samples significantly differed after the work shift. Overall, there were 1,739 MPs identified in samples before the work shift, which increased to 3,063 MPs by the end of the day.

There was a significant difference in the number of MPs in the hair, hand, saliva, and face mask samples before and after the work shift. MPs were grouped into four categories including fiber, film, spherule, and fragment. Fiber MPs were the highest in frequency at 4,632, followed by spherules and fragments at 95 and 75, respectively.

A total of 1,856 MPs were over 1,000 micrometers (μm) in size, whereas 1,478 particles were between 500-1000 μm, 1,020 particles were between 250-500 μm, 294 particles were between 100-250 μm, and 154 particles were less than 100 μm in size.

After the work shift, MPs were larger in hand and hair samples, whereas MPs were smaller in saliva and facial skin samples at this time. A total of 2,012 MPs were transparent/white, 1,184 were black, 1,146 were blue/green, 298 were red, and 162 were purple.

Forty MPs were selected for spectroscopic analysis. Of these, 34 were fibers made of polyester, polyamide, nylon, high-density polyethylene, polybutylene terephthalate, and polyethylene terephthalate. Six MPs were spherical or polyhedral in shape and consisted of polyethylene terephthalate.

Conclusions

The researchers identified 4,802 MP particles in different samples from factory personnel. Features like beard/mustache, clothing, and cosmetic product use influenced exposure to MPs.

Hair samples exhibited the highest concentration of MPs, which also significantly increased after work. Further research is required to investigate how these MPs impact human health.

Journal reference:
  • Shahsavaripour, M., Abbasi, S., Mirzaei, M., & Amiri, H. (2023). Human occupational exposure to microplastics: A cross-sectional study in a plastic products manufacturing plant. Science of The Total Environment. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163576
Tarun Sai Lomte

Written by

Tarun Sai Lomte

Tarun is a writer based in Hyderabad, India. He has a Master’s degree in Biotechnology from the University of Hyderabad and is enthusiastic about scientific research. He enjoys reading research papers and literature reviews and is passionate about writing.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Sai Lomte, Tarun. (2023, May 07). Microplastics: How safe are factory workers from invisible threats?. News-Medical. Retrieved on December 26, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230424/Microplastics-How-safe-are-factory-workers-from-invisible-threats.aspx.

  • MLA

    Sai Lomte, Tarun. "Microplastics: How safe are factory workers from invisible threats?". News-Medical. 26 December 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230424/Microplastics-How-safe-are-factory-workers-from-invisible-threats.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Sai Lomte, Tarun. "Microplastics: How safe are factory workers from invisible threats?". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230424/Microplastics-How-safe-are-factory-workers-from-invisible-threats.aspx. (accessed December 26, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Sai Lomte, Tarun. 2023. Microplastics: How safe are factory workers from invisible threats?. News-Medical, viewed 26 December 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230424/Microplastics-How-safe-are-factory-workers-from-invisible-threats.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Higher diet quality scores linked to lower emissions but come with trade-offs