Novel inhalable COVID-19 vaccine

A recent study published in the Nature Biomedical Engineering journal illustrated a novel inhalable SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate centered on exosomes (Exos) coupled with recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) receptor-binding domain (RBD).

Study: Exosomes decorated with a recombinant SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain as an inhalable COVID-19 vaccine. Image Credit: WESTOCK PRODUCTIONS / ShutterstockStudy: Exosomes decorated with a recombinant SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain as an inhalable COVID-19 vaccine. Image Credit: WESTOCK PRODUCTIONS / Shutterstock

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic affects almost every aspect of daily life for the global population as hundreds of thousands of people die each day from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). There are currently about 36 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines available across the globe.

The initially approved two SARS-CoV-2 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines, i.e., Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech, need a cold chain for storage and transportation. Besides, they trigger systemic immunity through intramuscular injection. 

Early pathogen penetration is influenced significantly by the immune response of the airway mucosa, which results in humoral and cell-mediated immune responses that result in systemic reactions. As respiratory droplets are the primary means of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and the respiratory mucosa is the initial site of viral entry, inadequate mucosal immunity may restrict the effectiveness of intramuscularly delivered COVID-19 vaccinations.

About the study

The goal of the current study was to create a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine option that effectively stimulates mucosal immunity, enables a non-invasive, needle-free delivery method, and is lyophilizable and room-temperature (r.t.)-stable for months. The scientists developed an inhalable vaccine by combining SARS-CoV-2 RBD with lung spheroid cell-derived Exos (LSC-Exo) surface, i.e., RBD-Exo, to create a virus-like particle (VLP) that mimics the morphology of the native virus. 

From a human lung donor sample, the team produced LSCs. They have previously used rodent models of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) to analyze the biodistribution and safety of LSC-Exo. LSC-Exo was native nanoparticles (NPs) for lung therapeutics obtained from distinct lung cell populations, such as type I and II pneumocytes and mesenchymal cells.

The researchers validated optimal Exo delivery across the rodent lung's parenchyma and bronchi. They evaluated the retention and biodistribution of NPs (liposomes or LSC-exosomes) in the murine lung. Furthermore, microscopic visualization and ex vivo imaging were conducted using red fluorescent protein (RFP) loaded commercially available liposomes (RFP-Lipo) and LSC-Exo (RFP-Exo).

Results and conclusions

According to the study results, the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-Exo vaccine triggered cellular and humoral immune reactions that protected mice from an infection with a SARS-CoV-2 mimic and a live SARS-CoV-2 infection in a hamster model. 

RBD-Exo vaccination resulted in significant concentrations of RBD-selective immunoglobulin A (IgA) and CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and potent IgG antibodies in the lung. These components were essential for preventing SARS-CoV-2 D614G and wild-type variant infection and defending the lungs against the viral invasion of the airway mucosa. Based on the data presented in this study, if Exos is the vaccine carrier, inhalation was a safe and reliable approach for inducing a potent mucosal immunity.

The authors discovered Exo biodistribution over liposomes in the lungs of healthy CD1 mice. They selected Exos as the foundation of the VLPs they created because of their exceptional lung retention and improved specificity of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). The average diameter of Exos was marginally enhanced by RBD decorating, according to nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). The study results validated the generation of RBD-Exo VLPs. 

The present data depicted that RBD-Exo had significant physical and antigenic stability at all evaluated temperatures, possibly outperforming the currently approved COVID-19 vaccines. Besides, lung dendritic cells (DCs) collected and processed RBD-Exo preferentially. In contrast to RBD-Exo, the team also discovered little free RBD acquisition by the APCs present in the lungs.

Ex vivo imaging and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) implied that RBD-Exo VLP vaccinations favored the quick elimination of SARS-CoV-2 mimics in CD1 mice. Additionally, nebulization administration caused a faster clearance of SARS-CoV-2 mimics in all groups than intravenous (IV) injection. This inference indicated that nebulization was a more effective and targeted method of delivering RBD-Exo vaccines. Inhaling RBD-Exo VLPs caused the highest induction of RBD-selective IgG antibodies in mouse sera, according to an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

While RBD-Exo nebulization generated a type 1 T helper (Th1)-biased immune reaction, RBD-Exo IV injection triggered a Th2-skewing immune response with selective IgG1 antibody production. Compared to RBD-Exo IV therapy, RBD-Exo VLP significantly increased the generation of RBD-selective IgA antibodies in serum complementary to the IgG isotype.

The current findings showed that inhaling RBD-Exo led to the production of anti-RBD neutralizing antibodies and secretory IgA (SIgA) responses. RBD-Exo with long-term storage (LTS) and RBD-Exo generated Th1-skewed cellular immune reactions in the mouse lungs. The RBD-Rhodamine (RhB) treatment group showed a decreased RBD signal in the main organs compared to the RBD-Exo nebulization cohort.

Splenocytes from RBD-Exo inhalation-treated animals had higher percentages of CD40+, CD86+, and CD80+ DCs, implying that more DCs were stimulated. With no allergic-type reactions, RBD-Exo inhalation strongly triggered a systemic T-cell immune reflex that can further safeguard the participants from viral replication. The histology data firmly suggested that RBD-Exo vaccination could significantly prevent live SARS-CoV-2 infection in hamster lungs. Moreover, RBD-Exo VLP-induced IgA antibodies with greater cross-activity compared to IgG antibodies.

Overall, the investigators noted that r.t. and lyophilizable COVID-19 vaccines, such as the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-Exo VLPs developed in the current study, have a longer shelf life and hence, could lower transportation costs, making them more widely available.

Journal reference:
Shanet Susan Alex

Written by

Shanet Susan Alex

Shanet Susan Alex, a medical writer, based in Kerala, India, is a Doctor of Pharmacy graduate from Kerala University of Health Sciences. Her academic background is in clinical pharmacy and research, and she is passionate about medical writing. Shanet has published papers in the International Journal of Medical Science and Current Research (IJMSCR), the International Journal of Pharmacy (IJP), and the International Journal of Medical Science and Applied Research (IJMSAR). Apart from work, she enjoys listening to music and watching movies.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Susan Alex, Shanet. (2022, July 05). Novel inhalable COVID-19 vaccine. News-Medical. Retrieved on November 05, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220705/Novel-inhalable-COVID-19-vaccine.aspx.

  • MLA

    Susan Alex, Shanet. "Novel inhalable COVID-19 vaccine". News-Medical. 05 November 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220705/Novel-inhalable-COVID-19-vaccine.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Susan Alex, Shanet. "Novel inhalable COVID-19 vaccine". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220705/Novel-inhalable-COVID-19-vaccine.aspx. (accessed November 05, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Susan Alex, Shanet. 2022. Novel inhalable COVID-19 vaccine. News-Medical, viewed 05 November 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220705/Novel-inhalable-COVID-19-vaccine.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
African production of mpox vaccines could secure the continent’s health